Dissertations On Quantitative Easing
Herkimer
Dissertations On Quantitative Easing W 69th Street zip 10069
Calculate Your Price
Word count 275
Price for this order:
$12
Proceed to
Order

When can we help you?

Running late with the deadline for your work? Then we are your reliable assistant in paper help.

Get ready to ask for our assistance when you need essays, research or course works, reports, case studies, etc. Our experts have seen it all and are ready to start working on your assignment right away. Go for it!

Why trust us?

With over 6 years of experience in the custom writing service, our team of support agents, managers, editors and writers has got a lot of knowledge about everything that may be required by you. Heres what you get for sure when cooperating with us:

  • Professional paper writer. Our native speakers are true masters at creating unique and custom works per the most detailed and even the vaguest instructions you have.
  • Quality writing. We check all works with several detectors. To make sure your work is 100% unique, add a Plagiarism Report to your order.
  • Convenience of your personal control panel. Signing in, you can get your expert in touch through a direct message, also place orders there, and see their statuses.

Everyone needs some paper help from time to time, because we are only human.

Whats included in the total cost?

Our prices start at $10 per page for works completed from scratch and from only $6 per page you need to be edited and proofread.

What factors influence the cost of our paper writing services? There are 5 of them:

  • Type of work
  • Deadline
  • Academic level
  • Subject
  • Number of pages

Youre a lucky client! Why? Because you never pay for everything. You have lots of freebies to go with every single assignment. They are:

  • title page
  • reference page (bibliography)
  • formatting
  • 3 free revisions
  • scan for originality
  • email delivery

Asking for our paper writing help, you dont only pay us. We also pay you! You can receive up to 15% bonuses back and even earn money with our referral program.

Your full security

We understand that sometimes you may want your deeds to go unknown. That is why we guarantee your complete privacy and security with our paper help writing service. After registration, you receive a unique ID and that is the only thing along with your instructions visible to our experts. Only our support team will see all the details you provide to be able to contact you in case any questions arise and send you a happy birthday discount on your special day.

Our custom writing service is completely ethical and provides busy students with great resources for their assignments. In the modern world when we need to do a lot of things at the same time, its nice to know you can count on someone for back up. We are always here to create the needed sample or perfect your work through editing/proofreading or explain the solutions to any problems you may have. Find out how much more free time you can get with our writing help.

Dissertations on quantitative easing streets of london essay State University of New York at Delhi, roman bednarik dissertation School of Law, Bank Street College of Education (graduate school), Morningside Heights, Manhattan, next to Columbia University buy literature review on management for 10 Fulton County. New York University School of Medicine examples of introductory essays crystal reports conditionally suppress drawing object 43rd Street, West zip 10036. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy uds reporting period definition dissertation methodology checklist Putnam Webb Institute, f/k/a Webb Institute of Naval Architecture, Monroe College best free credit report reddit West Street zip 10011.

Dissertations on quantitative easing

Dissertations on quantitative easing do my hebrew meaning of omer oregon shad fishing report [Music] good morning I'd like to call this meeting of the capital investment committee for May 4th to order we do have a quorum and therefore representative Eckland have you looked over the minutes of April 25th than would you hear it move them thank you I have looked over the minutes mr. chair and I will move them thank you those in favor say aye the minutes are once again prevail okay obviously today people are here for a reason apparently we've got something on the agenda that draws more than our normal agenda and so we'll just move right along and try to do the best we can and we literally message Burton the first item I would like to I will make a motion to move this bill to ways and means those in favor say aye both Gary and now IRB's of Hanson after I do the move the delete all I'll come to you and then I would like to I would like to move 40 404 or the delete all amendment to it live labeled a5 any discussion on the delete all which gets me where I want to build to be what Oh first mistake of the morning the amendment labeled a 18-0 eight six nine so you're all looking at the right document so I am moving the opposite moment my amendment 240 404 labeled as a 18.086 9 discussion representative Hansen Thank You mr. chairman before we vote on this I need to disclose that there is a provision in here that is not mine but it provides funding for a trail that run that would run adjacent to my property thank you very much for that notification any other discussion on the amendment see none those in favor say aye Britany the eyes prevail all right so now we'll do a overview of what we have starting with the spreadsheet mr. Lee mr. chair and members in your packet there should be a portrait right size spreadsheet that looks like this starting with the University of Minnesota the total appropriation for University of Minnesota is 78 million five hundred and thirty three thousand with 40 million for asset preservation ten point five three three million for Greater Minnesota academic renewal 24 million for Pillsbury Hall renewal and four million for glensheen asset preservation for Minnesota state colleges and universities the total is 122 million at point eight five eight of which twenty seven point six million is user financed and ninety-five point two three nine is geo bonding forty million is for asset preservation twenty two point five million is for bid miji state 20 2.8 million is for Rochester at community Technical College 6.4 million is for MSU Mankato 569 thousand is for anoka-ramsey Community College 6.36 2 million is for century college twelve point six three six is for Normandale Community College six hundred and twenty eight thousand is for Minnesota State University at Moorhead and six nine eight is for Inver Hills Community College 10.1 million is for room for land Community College moving to the Department of Education the total is 47 million of which 2 million is for library construction grants 25 million is for school safety grants fourteen point four nine two million is for the Red Lake School District five million is for atwater cosmos Grove City School District for elementary school purposing and six hundred thousand in general fund is for the ward School District for the Northwest angle school under the state academies two million for asset preservation under the Department of Natural Resources the total is sixty two point seven five million with 30 million for asset preservation 20 million for flood hazard mitigation six million for acquisition betterment of buildings two million for improving accessibility of state parks and recreation areas 750,000 for a Glenda no state park 1.5 million for Bluff land State Trail or for the bluff line segment of the Harmony State Trail 1 million for the city of Cohasset for trail and Recreation Area and 1.5 million for the mill acts East ATV loop under the Department of pollution control 20 million twenty point three million for total six million for the waste disposal engineering closed landfill program seven million for Clay County for weeks the resource recovery Center 7.3 million for the redwood Cottonwood drain powers board for a lake redwood rec nation under the board of water and soil resources fifteen point seven eight one million of which ten million is for rim reinvest in Minnesota five million is for local road of wetland replacement program and in a grant to political subdivision 780 1004 the city of South st. Paul for sidles lake under the rural Finance Authority 35 million in user financed loans for the Finance Authority 10 million for the Minnesota Zoological Gardens for asset preservation under administration sixteen million is the total appropriation five million is from Capra one million is for capital memorial repairs and ten million is for capital security upgrades under the Department of military affairs 4.4 five million for st. cloud a mechanic a mechanical envelope repair of that building and under public safety the total is twenty two point five million and these are all grants to political subdivisions with first being nine point nine million for Cottage Grove six point six million for the Dakota for Dakota County and six million for the city of Marshall under the Department of Transportation the total appropriation is a hundred and fourteen million point one four one for the local road grant program the undesignated program is seventy two point three one four point three two one million in the specific grants there is 13.5 million for the city of Dayton for the Brockden interchange and six point 1 million for Inver Grove Heights for Argenta trail then there is a project that is split in two parts the general fund portion is and this is both for Hennepin County's kasaa nine and I 494 bridge project or Rockford Road five point three six million is from Jennifer from geo bonds and five point three six million is for the trunk highway bonds for Ramsey County railroad separation project I believe this is pre-designed design 1 million in geo bonds and finally that there's a trunk highway project railroad separation in polk county on trunk highway 29 at 10.5 million under the metropolitan council the total appropriation is 20 million 10 million for Metro regional parks 5 million for influen infiltration grant it's 2 million for the city of New Hope for a 50 meter pool 3 million for the city of st. Paul for the walk on TB Center the Department of Human Services fifty four point six five million in total the total appropriation of which 10 millions for asset preservation six point seven five million is for the Anoka roof and HVAC replacement and twenty five point 1 million is for grants for regional mental health crisis centers one of the grants of political subdivisions 10 million is for the city of Minneapolis for the family of partnership 1.9 million is for a Scott County for the Crisis Center for crisis center and 900 thousand in general fund is for White Earth for the opioid center under the Department of Veterans Affairs 10 million for asset preservation of the Department of Corrections 24.6 5 million is the total appropriation of which 20 million is for asset preservation 2.7 million is for the st. cloud interior perimeter fence second phase and 1.95 million is for moose lake control room renovation under the Department of Employment and economic development 87.7 1/9 is the total appropriation of which 3 million is for be dpi 10 million is for transportation economic development and 2 million is for IB dpi under the raster political subdivisions for Austin Public Television 2.8 five million for the city of Brooklyn Park for Second Harvest 18 million in general fund cash spending six point nine million for the city of Duluth for the superior street steam project 1 million for Hennepin County Children theater five hundred and fourteen thousand for Edessa County for radio infrastructure for the radio tower 290,000 for city of Jackson for a Memorial Park redevelopment 1 million or 100,000 excuse me in general fund for the city of Litchfield for an opera house 15 million for the city of Minneapolis for the upper harbour terminal redevelopment project 500,000 for Pipestone County for the dental center 3 million for the Polk County North Country Food Bank 1.76 5 million for the city of silver Bay for the black beach camp around 4.5 million for st. Paul Conway Center six point excuse me 2.7 million for the city of st. Paul for the Humanities Center 2.5 million for the city of st. Paul the Minnesota Museum of American Art and 8.1 million for the city of Waukesha for the Eagle Center and 5 million for the city of white Park for the quarry redevelopment and the public facilities authority of the total appropriation is a hundred and twenty million of which twenty million is for state matching grants for the US EPA capitalization grants 55 million divided between water infrastructure for the clean water program and the drinking water program and of which three million is specific for the grant to the city of Windham then under the wastewater infrastructure point source implementation grants forty five million under the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency six point seven million for public housing rehabilitation for the Minnesota Historical Society the total appropriation is 40 million thirty of which is for the fort snelling visitor center and the spread sheet says designed but is actually construction and then ten million for historic sites asset preservation and then the next few lines are for the minnesota management and budget for bond sale expenses 890,000 for the geo bond sale and two and twenty thousand for trunk highway bonds in article two there is an additional appropriation for mhf a infrastructure bonds these are appropriation bonds and the total authorization for that is 550 million then in the next few lines are the total sum of the various funds the net geo supported is or the total geo support is on line 223 and then there is a cancellation of unspent portion of a previous bond authorization for the city of Bloomington for Linda Lane that's on line 225 and so the net total for geo supported is on line to 27 at 825 million thank you mr. Lee any questions of his delete miss Dyson the next portion please mr. chair and members of the committee in your packet also there is a bill summary that looks like this and if you on page one of the bills summary section one covers what I some people call the boilerplate I call it the rules of the bill and I would flag that for everyone to be aware of what covers the spending in article one and then I will proceed to article two and in the bill summary that begins on page five and in the bill itself it's on page 37 and begins with the section 1 is amending the statute that governs grants to political subdivisions to strike and obsolete subdivision that was repealed in 2009 and then adds a portion of a sentence to reflect language that is also in section 1 of article 1 relating to grants to political subdivisions the section 2 is relates to the hazardous materials rail safety program that was enacted last year and adds relocation of publicly owned utilities to what can be paid for under this program on page 6 of the bill summary page 38 of the bill the exemptions this is the State Building Code and exempts the House and Senate chambers door locks from the State Building Code in order for the House and Senate to install door locks that will meet the body's needs section four began on the lower half of page 38 of the bill this is the point source implementation grant program and it adds a new subdivision relating to supplemental grants and the first paragraph of that you'll see that a grant is not awarded under this subdivision unless there is a specific amount appropriated for the purposes of this subdivision so that an appropriation generally for the point source implementation program without reference to this subdivision does not trigger this subdivision and then the new language will apply if if the combined sources of funding from width and the point source program and any other funds is less than 50% of total project costs or the amount needed to reduce the annual cost per household for the wastewater system in the project areas no more than twice what it is in the metro area and this is for Greater Minnesota cities section 5 on page 39 of the bill this is again just requesting the PFA to provide estimated cots needs for with an point source implementation section 6 beginning on page 40 of the bill and going through page 42 this is the housing infrastructure housing infrastructure bond authorization through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency and it adds a definition of senior housing it authorizes senior housing and manufactured home parks to the purposes for which housing infrastructure bonds may be issued and used and then provides some criteria for prioritizing comparable probe proposals for senior housing the additional authorization is 50 million dollars and the debt service in section 9 on page I think it's on page 43 you'll see the language related to the additional debt service paid from the general fund is 2 million in fiscal year 2021 and then in fiscal year 2022 4 million year to pay debt service on the additional 50 million authorization beginning on Fort page 43 of the bill and section 10 of article 2 are changes to prior appropriations in bonding bills beginning with the 2009 appropriation for veteran cemeteries and I believe this provision was in the governor's bill and it allows for seeking funding for capital improvements extends the availability the money to 2022 and our the end of 2022 and then provides that federal reimbursement for design and pre design of the veteran cemeteries can be used for asset preservation at veteran's homes after the design is completed for cemeteries in redwood st. Louis and Fillmore counties instead of all legislatively authorized veterans cemeteries on page 44 again from the governor's bill there is an amendment to the 2014 appropriation for the Minnesota state academies that allows the unspent money from that year to be used for asset preservation on page 45 of the bill section 12 the 2014 appropriation to Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board for the Brian Coyle Community Center is extended to 2020 and then on page 46 of the bill there is a change to the 2015 2014 I'm sorry appropriation for Rice Lake and what this rice lake incorporated in as a city in 2015 so this is correcting it from being a town to being a city and then it extends the availability section 14 on page 46 of the bill is amending a 2014 appropriation for the st. Cloud State Prison project to allow money that remains from that appropriation to be used for the project that was authorized last year and extends its availability to 2020 the section 15 of the bill on page 47 local road improvement fund grants is allowing the 2015 appropriation for the wilmore Y to be used for pre designed designed right-of-way acquisition and engineering as well as for of the roads section 16 on page 48 of the bill is the state trail recreation area park and acquisition development correcting the 2017 appropriation this was it's just a chain correction of the dollar amount it doesn't change any authorizations or actual spending that was possible so page Cisco page 50 the local Road Improvement Grants this is clarifying the Columbus interchange in Anoka County what can be included in the project this is also from 2017 section 18 on page 53 of the bill the rail service Improvement Program in 2017 there was 1 million of dollars appropriated for rail service Improvement Grants in the transportation finance bill this year and in the bill summary I give the citation to the bill number engrossment and where you can find this it creates a new freight rail economic development grant program Fred and this is not yet enacted so the change to the 2017 rider for the rail service Improvement Program only takes effect if the Fred program Fred grant program is actually enacted and then it makes the change effective at the same time the page 54 of the bill section 19 is the Grand Rapids pedestrian bridge project from 2017 and it adds construction which I believe was the intent that originally was to include construction as well as design with that money on page 54 of the bill again Eden Prairie rail grade crossings there was this is the 2017 appropriation and one of the crossings is actually with a pathway and that clarifies that this money can be used for a crossing for a pathway as well as roads on page 55 of article 2 the White Bear Lake multi-use trails this corrects the dollar amounts between the various grants to cities and some corrections in the roads that are in the alignments let's see page 56 the Minneapolis grant to the for the Family Partnership this is take deleting the requirement for non state contribution the dollar amount was intended to cover the total cost of the pre design and design and then allows any money that's remaining to go to the next phase of the project on then the bottom of page 56 is the Minnesota Correctional Facility in Saint Cloud this corrects the project description for the Saint Cloud prison project from last year and then on page 57 of the build the st. Paul Minnesota Museum of American Art adds acquisition to the uses of the money in this corresponds to the authorized uses of the appropriation for this project this year and then on page 58 of the bill the Denison sewage treatment improvements there was a request from the engineers involved in this to clarify the uses of the money for that project there is also the Fort Snelling project that allows use of any unspent money from 2017 to go to the project this year and this year's build for the actual construction of the new Visitor Center at Fort Snelling and then there is the uncoated provision for the behavioral price health crisis facilities grants that's appropriated money in article 1 this is the program that would implement those grants and then as mr. Lee mentioned on the last page on page 60 of the bill there is the appropriation from the general fund for in the tales for the I think it's a grant to the commissioner of administration for a permit review and that concludes article 2 mr. chair all right thank you all right what we will be doing is going into public testimony next and then after that we'll have amendments and discussed the bill I would just get I'm gonna just give a quick little overview here before the public testimony of my own and that is we have an 825 million dollar target 25 million of which is for the school security and so essentially after that we have 800 million dollars now in this bill 67% deals with asset preservation about 38% of the bill with that and then conservation water about 16% and transportation about 13% so the goal in this was to be very heavy on infrastructure bricks-and-mortar asset preservation we only own 6,200 buildings we should take care of them in PFA which I assume will be testifying later we have about as you have heard 120 million dollars which is the most that's ever been put into this category I think it's important to deal with the crumbling infrastructure that we have to the extent possible we have a bill that I think is geographically balanced and trying to also put the other bill that is bipartisan in terms of where the projects are and I think we have accomplished those goals we have 8.5 million dollars in cash as mr. Lee pointed out where those projects are earlier the bulk of it six point nine million going to Duluth and so I think those are the highlights I think we have done and I want to thank the committee for the job that you did in helping to put this together it's a good bill in many respects and so with that I will begin the public testimony and I'm very very interested in hearing the many different ways that you can say thank you and also how you can say in various ways we need more money you have a couple of minutes we have a lot of testifiers and so you have two minutes and we do have a a system of alerting you as to one minute in 30 seconds so you can wind yourself down so with that we will begin with the Commissioner Myron Frans mr. chair if he'll be all right I'd like to ask mr. D'Amato mr. Mossman to join me to sing but we need to add at least three for you know the three minutes together here mister but I don't know if I can take that much power in one place at the same time if that's all right Thank You mr. chair and thank you committee for letting us testify today and I do want to say thank you as you suggested to start off but thank you really to the chair of the committee and the staff in particular for working with all the stakeholders but it's particularly MMB on getting a lot of these technical Corrections made in the bill very critical part of the bill thank you for that word you know yesterday mr. chair the governor was asked about this bill you may have heard he asked well where's the other half so I'm here today that's really a good question mr. chair I look forward to seeing the other half of this bill what I would really want to say is please don't stop here the work of the committee is not done you know mr. Commissioner Mossman I want to remind the committee of the important work the priorities that you laid out are good priorities the part of the problem is simply that we don't have the bonding bill at the size that we need you know one of the things that we have to now say and you're going to have to listen to committee and mr. chair today are people talking about what's not in the bill and what needs to be done I don't think any of us disagree that we have over a 3.3 billion dollar list of problems to to deal with and we've deal with a very small portion of that in this bill I know that many people say we cannot afford a 1.5 billion dollar bonding bill but mr. chair as the state's chief financial officer I say we can and we must do so to be fiscally responsible we must fix this critical infrastructure now not later you cannot afford to kick the can down the road anymore so I ask again mr. a chair where's the other half of this bill [Applause] so you asked where's the other half of the bill and wheeled in the beyond mr. chair I knew people were clapping for what I was saying I was looking down I was quite concerned we said we need more money that neither they have the bill and younger starts to clap yeah but he wasn't looking at me mr. chairs I knew something was out but welcome back though represented Lily the only comments represent Lily here to me about cutting trees or anything just really thank you everyone I'm I'm pretty messed up I have over 20 different broken bones and I'm not gonna walk and wrong and hug anybody but a little bit of medication but this really blessed by all of you by you know just at both sides I love Dan Fabian actually came to visit this morning and he actually we had he will be in but they'll head over and we anyways just everybody's been great so I'm sorry to interrupt so much but I I've really enjoyed serving on this committee and I know it's basically done but anyways I just want to make sure you don't give it all to Ray no thank you thank you everyone well thank you great to have you here I don't know what to say after that out if we if Madison could put represent Lily back together certainly we can get enough money to put Minnesota back together maybe try to get my act back together here you know the state borrows money through low-interest loans that we are able to achieve through our good credit rating and we're able to use to leverage our revenue to in order to invest in capital projects around the state so one of the things that we believe that the 1.5 billion dollar bonding bill that the governor recommended falls within the 3.5 billion dollar debt capacity that we have but I want to take one opportunity to brag a little bit about MMB and what we've done to manage the debt similar to refinancing a home the state actively monitors interest rates and identifies opportunities for savings we refinance state debt by taking advantage of low interest rates and in the process we see the taxpayer of millions of dollars I'm happy to inform you that since 2011 we have saved over 300 million dollars for the state of Minnesota and interest payments through refinancing that 300 million dollars of savings translates into annual general fund savings of between 10 and 20 million dollars over the next 10 years governor Dayton's team at MMB tries to manage very carefully the debt and we think we've done so in a way that provides an opportunity for this state to invest in more and more bonding I think the other thing that governor's bonding bill represents sound fiscal management to make sure that we take care of the assets that we have and let's not forget about the jobs that are created with a 1.5 billion dollar bonding bill and obviously a lot less if a half or so for the current bonding bill so I urge the governor the governor's bill to to be adopted and and I urge this committee to keep working and I'll do whatever I can to help convince you to add more to this bonding bill and I'll turn it over to Commissioner Mosman that's there any questions Thank You Commissioner Commissioner mr. chair and committee members Matt mossman's missioner of the state department of administration thank you for the opportunity to testify and welcome back represent Lillie first I want to thank you mr. chairman for fully funding the department's five million dollar capital request that's the only enterprise-wide asset preservation fund that is available to all state agencies we track at the Department of Administration the condition of all state assets and we know that as we sit here today that we have an enterprise-wide deferred maintenance backlog that is already eight hundred and fifty million dollars with over five hundred million dollars of asset preservation needed just to fix the worst rated building conditions in addition there's 1.96 billion that is needed to renew or replace building systems that are at the end of their useful life bringing total asset preservation needs for agencies to 2.8 billion dollars over ten years so mr. chairman and members I emphasize the scope of the problem because as today's bill does provide a positive starting point for a long overdue need to take care of buildings that we already own at this level of investment we will continue to be stuck in a cycle of inefficiency sufficient asset preservation is needed to return state assets to acceptable condition and then to continue regular preventative maintenance the reality is that the fact that we're struggling to simply keep up with fixing things when they break is a sign of just how bad the problem is the fiscally responsible standard is to maintain infrastructure to prevent it from breaking in the first place so the other thing is is the added cost it costs twelve times more to repair a building in critical condition and to properly maintain it in the first place that means that the longer we wait the longer the backlog continues and the more the cost of repairs are when I visited the Hastings veteran's home last week with Commissioner Shillito we walked under leaking pipes and through wet rooms with peeling paints and Kremmling floors after a long winter the HVAC system at the silver Bay veteran's home was on its final legs in st. Peter Deputy Commissioner Johnson and I toured an institutional kitchen that reaches temperatures well in excess of a hundred degrees during the summer with condensation dripping down the walls due to an inadequate HVAC system in just the past few years we've experienced ductwork falling from ceilings into place spaces there are people work fire-starting in electrical boxes fire marshal orders to correct code violations and residential facilities water pipe breaks causing millions of damage unfortunately the millions spent to clean up after water pipe verse is money that is not spent to improve the building but simply to repair damage caused by failures that should have been avoided through regular maintenance the funding to care for deteriorating state buildings is not an agency operating budgets it must come from a bond angle and the size of the bill must align with the size of the need if we are going to dig our way out of this problem and the reality is that we just must the state owns these buildings and we need to take care of them so mr. chairman and members just sum it up these are not just office buildings with Cube farms these are local projects all over the state as some of you have heard me say there are libraries and laboratories parks and public health facilities historic sites and hiking trails campsites and correctional facilities from the armory to the zoo these are buildings and facilities that add to Minnesota's quality of life and they're located in 86 of Minnesota's 87 counties so mr. chairman and members the 97 million that is identified in the state agency bill specifically for general asset preservation addresses only about 11 percent of the jet of the deferred maintenance backlog that we are aware of that leaves about 90% of the 6,200 buildings that you refer to in over 26,000 facilities susceptible to further decline so mr. chairman members just wrapping up I again I appreciate willingness mr. chairman to engage in this important issue just as you let on the state capital preservation so as you know first hand how long and difficult it was to get that Capitol restoration project funded it is of course one of our state's most beloved and treasured landmarks but well not every asset preservation project is as popular as that they all still serve the public that greatly needed and the needs are located all across the state of Minnesota and I would just encourage you to work continue working on this bill to increase the amount available for asset preservation and renewal and with that happy to answer any questions Thank You commissioner we reserve Hanson Thank You mr. chair and Commissioner Fran's looking through the bill on page 60 section 28 that you know and you've been serving as a financial officer for a while for the state have you seen anything like section 28 in a bonding bill before mr. chair who representative you know I had seen this earlier no I have not this is a new provision to me it's a fine piece of legislation just okay thank you very much Thank You mr. chairman now we have the Department of Corrections and let me just say generally that because some of you who are requesting don't ya have the amount that you expected or wanted it is there there is or you're not in there at all it is not because the chair or the committee has a particular bias it's just we have 800 million dollars commissioner mr. chair committee members good morning Tom Roy Commissioner of Corrections I'm here to briefly talk about the contrast of your bill with the governor's proposals asset preservation I'm glad is on the top of both lists the governor's proposal for asset for Department of Corrections is 40 million and mr. chair was especially pleased to hear you talk about the importance of fixing crumbling buildings and I would add to that it's especially important for those buildings that are over a hundred years old and the state of Minnesota relies on prisons that were constructed literally in the horse-and-buggy days stillwater st. Claude Red Wing and moose lake approaching a hundred years we have extended the life of those facilities as best we can but we are way behind the curve in terms of asset preservation and Commissioner Mossman talked about deferred maintenance and the state's study shows that we have 13 buildings in crisis condition 47 buildings in poor condition and our total deferred maintenance currently calculated at 571 million dollars we also do appreciate your inclusion of the st. cloud perimeter fence and the Moose Lake Control renovation those were on our wish list the governor added two projects that we think are real important and that is the renovation of Lino Lakes building at 5.2 million and the willow river expansion of our challenge incarceration program and those two of renovations of existing facilities will give us about a hundred and five more beds for population growth or special treatment of existing prisoners on the governor's list also was the st. Claude plumbing and ventilation upgrade and and these are that's a particularly ugly project and I wish I could show you pictures of what a hundred-year-old clay sewer pipes look like but unfortunately that wouldn't be a great way to start the day we have significant needs in that aging facility how are the meds doing today so mr. chair committee members I I just will point out those topics to you and I'll I'll stand for questions I know your time and your agenda is very limited here so thank you Thank You commissioner we will move on next is the Keith Pelton of the Association on deck is John Ashe be in Bowser so far we've been a little off but I think you can do this in two minutes mr. chairman I'll try I do want to start off by thanking the chair for the funding for the regional mental health crisis centers the local government Roads wetland replacement program although we do have concerns as to whether that will be a debate what the funder the fund the entire two-year funding cycle the transportation economic development grants and the local road improvement program however we are concerned with the lack of funding for local bridges I think the committee or some members are under the misimpression that that bridge needs will be funded by last year's transportation funding bill that's simply not true there's only twelve point nine million available for funding local bridge needs that approaches three hundred and seventy three million dollars in total a hundred and seventy six million in bond funding needs for just two thousand eight alone unlike the local road improvement program which is a competitive grant program that takes need extensive time to solicit the grants to process them an award then the local bridge rehabilitation and reapply replacement program puts monies in all your local economies right now I've passed out the list of those projects that are ready to go has of last November and we've been told by the department that now that list includes over a hundred and forty projects with sixty four million dollars of bonding need this is probably one of the best ways to widely dispersed money from the efforts that you're making with this bill and injects money immediately into your local economy if you do it through the local road improvement program you're gonna be waiting over a year that'll conclude be happy to answer any questions Thank You mr. Carlson this let me point out that there is money in the transportation bill for local bridges we are we were informed that we are to do the larger bridges in this committee and that local sort of the smaller bridges are to be done through the transportation committee so that's why we don't have a larger amount for for bridges because we only had basically one larger bridge that we're going to do hey thank you mr. Karlson miss Josh key executive director board of water and soil resources we have Lynn have Hager of the Duluth zoo on deck good morning mr. chair and members Angie Becker koudelka as on you don't look for the same changed assistant director of the board of water and soil resources I'm here today on behalf of director Jackie who's unable to make it would like to thank the committee for the opportunity to testify and specifically talk about two provisions in the bill that were included as mr. Carlson said the local roads wetland replacement program is a state mandate that requires the state of Minnesota on a through Bowser to replace wetlands due to local road projects that impact wetlands the program is cost efficient it expedites permitting and it provides higher quality wetlands and is and is appreciated both state and locally for its cost savings the five million dollars continues the program it's one year worth of funding however the program is running a deficit right now and at current levels is unsustainable the Minnesota CREP conservation reserve enhancement program the committee has recommended funding at ten million dollars the conservation reserve enhancement program as you all know is a large federal state program that provides up to 350 million federal dollars directly out to landowners in Minnesota who voluntarily choose to protect vulnerable drinking water through wellhead protections to enhance grassland and wetland habitats and to provide water quality improvements sign-ups for the program began in May of 2017 we have already over 55 million dollars in applications that have been submitted to date this moves us ten million closer to our goal the governor's office did put in a 30 million dollar request so that bonding would be a larger part of this project thank you thank you very much mr. Helme have a ger is up next and following Lisa Wilcox Earhart of common bond welcome begin please good morning mr. chair community members thank you for allowing me to address the committee this morning my name is Lynn hamburger I'm with the Lake Superior zoo and I'm here on behalf of the Lake Superior Zoological Society the nonprofit that operates the Lake Superior zoo on behalf of the city of Duluth as you are all well aware six years ago next month Duluth in the surrounding area experienced what has been referred to as a hundred year flood as a result of that flood the zoo's most popular exhibit that was home to our polar bear and seals was destroyed beyond reasonable repair well I don't want to dwell on the flood it does define where we are today in the days weeks and months following the flood to society and the community took on the daunting task of restoring the zoo animals displaced by the flood were relocated to other zoos the grounds in the buildings were cleared of debris and cleaned and the zoo reopened to public less than a month later in close collaboration with the city of Duluth MnDOT in the Minnesota DNR several projects were undertaken to prevent the likelihood that such damage could ever happen again the only piece of the zoo's restoration that remains is the polar shores complex located in the center of our zoo for six years this exhibit the focal point of our zoo has remained empty and blighted due to the amount of financial assistance required to restore it of all of the entities in Duluth to suffer flood damage the Lake Superior zoo is the only one who has not yet been made whole by any disaster relief funds or assistance the Society has done its due diligence and all it can without support from our partners from state and local government we have brought forward what we consider to be a modest request for 1.9 million dollars to restore and preserve this historic and beloved asset we have secured 1.9 million in matching funds from the city of Duluth and we have an embarked on a capital campaign to raise an additional $500,000 private donations the proposed project is a brown bear habitat with an adjoining large cat exhibit that will relocate our snow leopard in links as part of the new master plan with the city of Duluth this project is the first phase of a larger plan to continue to improve our zoo and to ensure its future as a vibrant and sustainable community and educational asset the lakes appear close in the Lake Superior zoo is accredited by the Association of zoos and aquariums our service area includes not only the residents of the arrowhead region but the Iron Range northwestern Wisconsin those traveling from South in Metro Minnesota the Dakotas and Canada our zoo is steeped in Minnesota history and tradition and will be celebrating its centennial in five years we respectfully request your earnest consideration of our requests thank you for your valuable time and I'll be happy to answer any questions if you have them thank you and we'll see you later and you're welcome to visit us again now we have Lisa Wilcox Earhart common bond and this is Justin Hardwick please all right Thank You chair Durrell and members of the committee my name is Lisa Wilcox Earhart and I'm the executive vice president of housing and services at common bond communities and I'm here today as a representative of the homes for all coalition to thank you for including for funding affordable housing in the the house bonding bill common bond owns and manages five thousand seven hundred and forty seven units of high quality affordable rental apartments and townhomes in Minnesota that are home to more than 9,500 individuals the common bond is more than just apartments we care about providing opportunities and support for residents and many instances common bond residents take active leadership roles in their communities and youth in our teen programs achieve a hundred percent graduation rate seniors and veterans receive the support they need to live independently and stabilize your common bond I truly believe that none of these things would be possible without safe stable and affordable housing using housing infrastructure bonds common bond has been able to develop and preserve for projects equally in six hundred and sixty three units and helping 1147 people with additional funding we certainly can do more housing infrastructure bonds means nearly 100 individuals and families were able to find permanent affordable housing and access job training and supportive services at common bonds upper upper post veterans community a pre post veterans community and 47 other projects across the state would not be possible with housing infrastructure bonds HIV bonds are one of the few financial tools available for affordable housing thank you for including fifty million for HIV and six point seven million for general obligation bonds I encourage the committee to increase their numbers half of all Minnesotans who pay rent are cost burdened and paying more than 30 percent of their income on housing the number of families and children experiencing homelessness is increasing by preserving existing assets in providing supportive housing we can provide safe stable and affordable housing to hundreds more families the benefits of this investment are numerous including better performing students a more productive workforce and cost saving emergency services and that's Justin to say a word good morning mr. chairman in just a couple more words thank you good morning my name is Justin hi Rhode Island resident of common bond our proposed community I'd like to tell you a little bit about my background and why I appreciate having a home at common bond communities I grew up in upstate New York my mom worked as a nurse and took good care for my three siblings after high school I signed up for the delayed Entry Program in the military and went on to have a decent career in the army when I came from the military during a tough economic time I had hard times adjusting back to society ended up with some substance abuse problems in short than their two bad decisions bad decisions led to homelessness homelessness is why my life in 2014 sometimes I spent it outside other times I slept on the couch I could be at my brother's place sometimes but it was hard not to overstay my welcome as a military person I needed to have some get up and go of my own I needed some structure then I heard about common bond renovating the old fort snelling building and in November to 14 2014 I moved into the upper post it gives me a base lets me have structure my world is to get back on my feet I have a key to my own home I can use upper posts as a platform to do so many other things upper post is about self-sufficiency it gives vets a place to call home and it's space to heal when you've been homeless for so many years living under bridges and under trees it's pretty amazing things that someone hands you your own utilities and you can make your own coffee and scrambled eggs on of your own these things be so strongly to getting people back to self-sufficiency from homelessness to to shelters is a beautiful thing I've been in common bond homes for three years I was the first coordinator of the food shelf at upper post during those three years I also became a minister finally steady church home in the community I'm a youth coach I love volunteering to do good things with kids and sports like I said the common bond has it afforded me a platform to be able to give back and here's my final thought I'm comfortable I'm real comfortable now that I have a home but what about the guys not far behind me the guy who was walking in the lines between going on and back out on the streets or doing something with his life there's a lot going off for people of and of course we don't know their stories but when we finally say I'm tired and I need a place to lay my head and place like upper post is there for there's a vet out there there that's not comfortable and he needs a place to call home I'm okay now so I want to help others common bond has given me the platform to do so and it is my job because it's the right upright thing to do thank you very much thank you appreciate your comments mr. Harris and now we have Jeff Oliver the Golden Valley City Engineer with Commissioner tang earth all on deck and let me just say that we're not doing a real great job in this two minutes thing and two minutes means two minutes for both of you not two minutes each otherwise I could have five people up there from one group and suddenly I'm it you know and I was thank you I was mentally trying to figure out how many minutes you would actually talk and it wouldn't have been ten so let's continue please Thank You mr. chair I'm Jeff Oliver I'm the city engineer for the city of Golden Valley I have with me Lori Larson who is a resident of New Hope that took some of the photographs that you all received yesterday via email I'm here today representing not only Golden Valley but the cities of crystal and New Hope in support of full funding for the DNR flood damage reduction grant request that request includes an important project for the three cities that all contribute stormwater runoff to a flood prone area known as the de colo ponds in Medicine Lake Road area the recent flood damit a recent flood damage reduction study performed by the cities identified 39 properties that were prone to repeat flood damage with flood depths up to five feet on Medicine Lake Road which is a high volume County Road that it serves as the border between the three cities the study also laid out a long-range plan that included six projects to provide flood storage that would significantly reduce flood levels and these homes and businesses the cities are currently partnering with the Basset Creek Watershed Management Commission to prepare a feasibility report and I have a draft copy with with me today that in that include that is includes the projects that included in the DNR request when the six projects are completed the flood levels are when this project is completed the flood levels on Medicine Lake Road will be lowered significantly enough to allow safe passage of emergency vehicles during flood conditions in addition six properties will no longer be at risk of flooding during the 100-year flood and the and it will be the risk of flooding will be significantly reduced for additional homes by full providing full funding of the DNR reduction program you will allow the cities at Crystal Golden Valley and New Hope to begin final design of the first project and begin construction late in 2019 thank you for time and I'd be happy to answer questions you may have how did I do four times Larson's got about 15 seconds you can thank you for the consideration I have lived at this property for 12 years and repeatedly it has flooded to the levels that you saw on the photos that were sent to you and the idea of having dry property for the first time in 12 years is very exciting in the funding could make it possible so thank you well thank you I'm just wondering if there's any way we could combine represent our license pool request with thank you thank you very much mr. fingers ball and Arlene charm charm off from the Met Council would be next Thank You mr. chairmembers my name is Mary Tinker Thal I'm commissioner at the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency and I want to thank you today for including housing in the bonding bill this bill includes just under fifty million dollars in housing infrastructure bonds and six point seven million dollars for urgently needed repairs for public housing however as you've heard from some of my colleagues we are concerned that the amount of the funding in the bill is not sufficient to meet the statewide needs for investment in our housing infrastructure governor Dayton proposed 115 million in housing and his bonding proposal and we hope that as we go through the discussions that the bill and the number can be larger since 2012 with the support from the legislature on a bipartisan basis bonding dollars for housing have produced over 7500 homes in a hundred and twenty-four housing developments across the state we have provided you with a handout and that on page three has a map of all of the communities where these housing investments have been made since 2012 however each time that we've received housing infrastructure bonds we can only fund about one out of every three applications that comes in to the agency on a competitive basis the bill also adds two new eligible uses for housing infrastructure bonds and we want to say that we support the inclusion of the senior housing language we do have some concerns about including the manufactured home park infrastructure language because we think this is not the most appropriate funding source for that need but we're willing to work with the authors to talk further about that we remain concerned about the lower level of funding for these will make it difficult to meet all of the needs again we hope that we will be able to work with you to see a larger number as we move forward thank you just Thank You mr. chair a quick question so what percent of the hundred million would be for supportive housing is there such a number mr. chair representative we do not have a prescribed number in the housing infrastructure bonds there are now four eligible there would be four eligible activities five if but all of them were included supportive housing is one preservation land for Community Land Trust for single-family and then if you added two more senior and manufactured housing we have a competitive application and we don't determine how much will be set aside for each Thank You mr. chair when you a brief wait means I think you had a long list of workforce housing that was also all over the state and then I think we made some observation about the number of projects you've done we heard about the one at the upper post just previously but that you have a variety of veterans housing projects to share mr. chair representative Hausman yes that's correct we have supportive housing developments all over the state as well as preserved properties we have an another project near the VA hospital for veterans that just opened last year there's one also adjacent to the st. cloud hospital and we have we just learned yesterday when I was in Crookston that there is a project that just opened its doors in Moorhead also a project opened last year in Bemidji Rochester Grand Rapids Duluth etc so supportive housing is not something that's just needed in the Twin Cities we've worked very successfully with communities around the state to address issues of homelessness including veterans homelessness okay thank you and now we have Arlene chairman math Council Chuck Johnson Commission to VHS is next let me just quickly say that I understand the Commissioner thinketh all saying that it's difficult to fulfill a number of requests well yeah that's our difficulty here we could fulfill one in five it's like you know you throw out one cherry and four lumps of coal again please Thank You mr. chair and members of the capital investment committee my name is Alan Schurman I'm the chair of the Metropolitan Council I appreciate the opportunity to speak with you this morning as you are aware the governor recommended a hundred and five million in bonds for the Metropolitan Council to make investments in our arterial bus rapid transit system and construct a new bus maintenance and storage facility he also recommended five million dollars for inflow and filtration book grants to help local governments address address this problem so we aren't treating clean water and unnecessary capacity and adding unnecessary capacity in our wastewater system I do appreciate the committee including funding for influential infiltration grants at the governor's recommended amount but I was disappointed to see the lack of investment for transit in fact there's nothing for transit in this bill based on our conversations with legislators and in hearings in the included in the House Transportation Finance Committee we believe that our planned investment in arterial bus rapid transit enjoys bipartisan support a BRT is high frequency limited stop service offering an improved customer experience on arterial streets in an urban environment a BRT provides improved speed frequency passenger experience and reliability by upgrading vehicle and station quality without higher capital costs Construction impacts and right-of-way right-of-way requirements or a dedicated corridor these improvements lead to lower operating costs and improve ridership over system overall lower costs allow for faster implementation transit improvements if you've seen the a line which is our first arterial BRT line in our system it has seen a 32 percent increase in ridership just a year after opening so our plan is to add additional lines to the system and we're reliant on the state to move those projects forward so I would just encourage you I appreciate the the support for influent infiltration and as you can continue this process to consider including transit you could mention the parts - I appreciate the support for that as well thank you and now we have Chuck Johnson the Commissioner of VHS and and in the League of Minnesota cities next welcome question Thank You mr. chair my name is Chuck Johnson serves acting commissioner at the Department of Human Services and thanks for the work of the Committee on this bill I appreciate the inclusion of our third bonding priority 6.75 million dollars the Anoka hospital that will help us a lot in terms of the roof and HVAC repairs we need to make they're on notice a psychiatric hospital provides the care to some of the most needy patients in Minnesota and we need to keep that facility working properly we're also pleased with the committee's attention to asset preservation DHS has 152 facilities across the state two and a half million square feet these facilities provide critical care and treatment to vulnerable Minnesotans and also treatment to those individuals or civilly committed to us often because they can't be treated safely in the community however the bill only funds ten million dollars of the eighteen point six million dollar request we made for asset preservation we're concerned like a lot of agencies and as commissioner Mossman said we continue to struggle to keep up with those needs we have 60 million dollars in deferred maintenance across our facilities and over the last seven years we've averaged about a million and a half dollars a year we spend all of our operating budget to do building repairs that we don't have asked of preservation dollars to appropriately take care of we're also particularly disappointing to the bill to not include DHS is top priority and that relates to Phase two work for the sex offender program on the st. Peter campus this is a sixteen point two million dollar request this is to build more capacity at a part of the sex offender program it's called community preparation services this is the last part of treatment within the program it's also a part of treatment that court's order people to go into we don't control how many people go into this part of the treatment program in 2014 we had 22 men in this part of the program now we have one hundred and nineteen eighty nine of whom we have beds four and thirty of whom are on waiting lists these are older buildings what we propose is to remodel some older buildings to create 50 additional beds for these individuals as well as programming space and this is the top priority for DHS for this session we also would like to have the dietary building in st. Peter mr. Commissioner Mossman reference to this this building has no air conditioning and needs enough hvac upgrade now finally mr. chair I'd like to just mention the regional behavioral health crisis centers that are in the bill in the bill this would have DHS essentially oversee the grant mechanism that would provide funding to regions who want to create one of these crisis centers to set a criteria that we would have each of those entities meet in order to create the center included in that is sustainability ensuring that we're not building a building with millions of dollars if there isn't a sustainable program with revenue sources that will support that program going forward we appreciate being part of that process we think it's important we ensure that these programs are going to fill in need a gap in the community are going to be sustainable going forward we did put a fiscal note on that of two fds to manage that process that fiscal note is not funded we appreciate the inclusion of the two FTS we think it's important to ensure that that project is successful going forward thanks for the opportunity to share our concerns today Thank You commissioner and next we have and in a League of Minnesota cities and then can't lock a small from the DNR will be next well morning mr. chair and members my name is Ann Finn and I represent the League of Minnesota cities I'll make three points today the first is that we do appreciate the inclusion of funding for water infrastructure programs and we recognize that that's a substantial amount my colleague Craig Johnson would be before you today and tell you that he'd like to see that a little closer to the governor's number of 167 million secondly we are very appreciative of the local road improvement program funds that are included in this bill that program has been wildly successful with our cities and it has funded multiple very important projects that are pretty much on a very small scale but go a long way in our smaller communities and finally in terms of the local road improvement program one provision that we've been trying to secure for a number of years is to allow some of the funds within that program to be used for local cost participation and trunk highway projects and that's something that was included in representative House bill that was passed by the Transportation Committee and sent in this direction so I'd like to hopefully work with the author on getting that provision included in the future as this moves forward thank you thank you Miss Bennett next we have can't lock a small and up next after him Commissioner Jan Malcom from the Department of Health Thank You mr. chairman and I can't like I smell a directory capital investment for DNR and commissioner land work couldn't be here today and certainly I want to thank you for the funding that you provided for our natural resources ask the Preservation betterment of buildings flood hazard mitigation projects and the accessibility for state parks but they just reiterate on the needs for asset preservation DNR's asset preservation is is broader than just buildings it's for all types of assets in our 10-year needs report we identified 370 million dollars of unmet needs or of deferred maintenance 120 million of that was in buildings and like Commissioner Mossman said the 6,200 buildings in the state DNR has about a little less than half of those 2,700 192 are in crisis condition 520 are in poor condition the building components in these in these buildings like the roofs the walls the windows we have 29,000 building components there's four million dollars of unacceptable components and 30 million dollars of poor components so the 30 million dollars that you provided in this bill is a good start and I would urge the committee as you go forward certainly if the bill grows we could use more money here yeah and in future years we need to have a sustained level of funding I think that was talked about in committee earlier and that would really allow us to address these issues on an ongoing basis thank you thank you you know we have Commissioner Malcolm in and we have Alice of the question first Thank You mr. chair I was just gonna ask him if he if he gave his top priority of something that wasn't in the bill what would one what would the top one be I don't know if you if he could answer that right now or a small you want to tell us what number one is and I can you repeat the question you mentioned a variety of areas but if you if you identified the number one what's that what's the most crucial are our no mr. chairman and representative Hausman it's not in the bill oh that isn't not in the bill the well there was funding for everything in the others really Lake State Park [Laughter] mr. chairman the there was funding for everything in the governor's recommend recommendation except for dam safety yeah and in the dam safety program we had initially requested two million the governor's bill had a million and we did get nine point four million dollars last year in dam safety so we are working through that list we do hold money back in that program for any emergencies so I guess we receive funding in all the areas other than dam safety Thank You mr. well good morning chaired all members of the committee Jan Malcolm Commissioner of the health department I'm here today to call your attention to one item that is not yet in the committee's bonding bill we appreciate the difficulty of your task I'm thinking for Commissioner Frederickson as well this morning who camp who cannot be here to call your attention to the important need for bonding to shore up the building that we share in the department's of health and agriculture in our laboratory functions so we're talking about the lab building and specific which is just across the way here I know some of you have had the chance to visit the I hope others of you will be able to at some point it is an absolutely remarkable asset for the state of Minnesota the governor's bill included just under 20 million dollars to correct important safety energy and operational efficiency issues at the shared laboratory building architectural mechanical and electrical improvements are needed to support critical lab testing in the areas of emergency response food safety infectious disease homeland security and environmental contaminants following a 2014 flooding event which which happened as a result of the polar vortex winter and the the thawing of that happened after that time we had some really serious flooding in the in the building which led us to do a recommissioning study to look more deeply at what caused that and what other issues might be might be lurking and result in suboptimal building performance looking at the mechanical systems and electrical systems in particular we did identify in that study a number of needs including exhaust work improvements to the ductwork and air pressure control issues which are really quite important and serious given the the types of agents we deal with in the laboratories we really need to maintain our capacity to operate these labs at full capacity given their their importance and their impact not only on human health and the environment but the agricultural economy in Minnesota as well so we really strongly believe that this proposal fits the committee's priorities and the Chairman's priorities and speaks very clearly to what Commissioner Mossman talked about the the wisdom of preventing and fixing problems when they know when we know that they exist rather than waiting for the next catastrophic failure I'd also like to draw your attention to a general fund request that's included in the governor's bonding proposal that is for an additional just over two million dollars in one-time resources to replace outdated equipment in the public health laboratory again I would just mention that this this co-located laboratory between health and Ag has just added tremendous capacity for our state that I think is an excellent example of partnership and stewardship keeping these labs at their top of the nation capability I think is a wonderful investment for the state of Minnesota and returns great benefits to human health environment and the agricultural economy thank you so much for your consideration as you move forward thank you and now we have Steve Hughes er from the Minnesota cities and next Benjamin Johnson of the Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs welcome news Thank You mr. chair members of the committee my name is Stephen Hughes ER and I represent Metro cities metro cities represents the shared interests of cities in the seven-county metro area at the legislature executive branch and Metropolitan Council Metro cities would like to especially thank the committee for the inclusion of funding for inflow and infiltration mitigation atrocities also appreciates the inclusion of local road improvement fun grants in this bill we look forward to working with the committee as the bill advances thank you Oh congratulations very good you might get all your money involved now we have Benjamin Johnson and next Commissioner John link Stein Jared all members of the committee my name is Benjamin Johnson I'm the legislative director for the Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs thank you for allowing me to comment on House 540 404 like to start by saying thank you for including Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs in your capital improvements bill our agency is responsible for the operations maintenance and upkeep of five existing state veterans homes and two veteran cemeteries located all over the state of Minnesota we are tasked with making sure that our residents veterans and their spouses are not only well taken care of by our medical and support staff but that the buildings they call home are safe comfortable and well maintained we're responsible to the families of those heroes interred in our cemeteries to do our utmost and caring for their loved ones final resting place in addition to the residents and the families we owe to visitors staff and the people of Minnesota to do everything in our power to take care of these state assets we're bound by statute and obligated by our position to address the repair and upkeep needs of these existing veterans homes and cemeteries as with any home some of our maintenance requires more investment than the day-to-day operational funding is able to address the 10 million dollars in asset preservation funding that you've included will take care of some of our most critical issues however I need to note that we have requested and governor Dayton has supported 13 million dollars in funding to address our highest priority needs this is only a fraction of the approximately 38 million dollars in deferred maintenance that we're currently facing but we prioritized our most urgent positions 10 million dollars will absolutely be put to good use but I wanted to note that this will leave some significant repairs unfunded once again thank you for your consideration thank you very much good job now we'll have a Commissioner Jean Lee Stein from the PCA and next is Mike berelson U of M vice president for university services Thank You mr. chair John Lang Stein commissioned Minnesota Pollution Control Agency on behalf of all the residents of district 43 B I applaud my state legislator representative Lillie for his proof that he is one tough legislator I want to just comment quickly on several provisions of the bill this morning mr. chair given my family's legacy I'll say words of appreciation and danke shrine for the inclusion of the six million dollars for the W D landfill and in andover Minnesota a site that has proven to be more complicated and polluting than it originally thought second we are grateful for the inclusion of 120 million dollars for the public facilities authority in wastewater and water infrastructure across the state of Minnesota it's shy of the governor's request of 167 million but we we definitely know that those 120 million dollars are needed I personally been touring wastewater and drinking water facilities around the state and the need is obvious by the way it is the most ever issued before Thank You mr. chair I also have a serious concern that the bill fails to include any funding for the cleanup of the freeway landfill located in the city of Burnsville immediately adjacent to a 35 W at the Minnesota River that landfill is a threat to water resources including the drinking water for Burnsville and savage as well as the Minnesota River and we are started we have started our work on the site but we are now finding that pollution concerns are far worse than we anticipated and this bill leaves us without the resources to address that serious problem lastly mr. chair in Section 28 page 60 of the bill the funding for the Minnesota Environmental Science and Economic Review Board is objectionable to the agency because it it relies on a faulty presumption that the permits for municipal wastewater facilities are not adequately reviewed or that there are not opportunities for due process review of the permits by the communities it sets up a situation in which some permittees have special opportunity to review their conditions with the agency but not all and we will we oppose that provision with that mr. chair thank you thank you very much and next we have Mike berelson and then Emily Murray for the counties and let me Michigan link Stein just to briefly comment that with the freeway landfill you know we certainly recognize that as an important issue but there are a couple of problems one the cost is big but the other may be even more important in the minds of many is the what we consider to be an ownership question and if when that gets solved we are more likely to act on the other stuff welcome thank you good morning my name is bank Bertelsen end up vice president for university services at the university Minnesota and represent ability the president kaler asked me to tell you he's put in a call to Goldy and they hope that comes to you soon so mr. chair first again as many others thank you for your support of University of Minnesota in the seventy eight point five million dollars in the bill projects like the Greater Minnesota academic renewal and Pillsbury Hall in our list for many many years and we're grateful for your support to move those forward we're also appreciative of 40 million dollars in heat for included in the legislation we can put that money to work right away getting these resources in the hand of local Minnesota contractors across the state as you know the university requests a two hundred million dollars for cheaper this year and that remains our top priority in our capital request and the two hundred million dollars is not randomly chosen across the state the university should be spending two hundred million dollars investing twenty million dollars annually just to maintain the current condition of our large set of facilities hence we're in a declining condition for more credit for in critical space which increases the risk of facility failure and clearly undermines our ability to continue to research teach and learn our 10 year 4.2 billion dollar list of capital deferred capital renewal projects across the system only gets longer each year without continued support from the state at the forty million dollar target however many of our critical projects that you've seen on your tours and heard about will not be completed this the state support is very critical for us in that because he predicts are not products that are easily or able to be fundraise for we won't find donor who wants to put her name on an HVAC system or roof we count on the partnership of the state to renew these facilities and maintain their integrity mr. chair we are commonly we are keenly aware that you're under a operate under very strict budget target necessitates very difficult decisions for you and the committee we are grateful to be included and we just respectfully ask that as you continue your work that you look to find more resources for keeper and the critical capital renewal thank you thank you next we have Emily Murray of the counties and then Brian Yola the Minnesota State welcome mr. chairmembers my name is Emily Murray with the Association of Minnesota counties on behalf of AMC and the Minnesota Association of County social services administrators we want to thank the chair and the committee for including funding for the behavioral health crisis facilities in this bill this funding is an important step to build the infrastructure and facilities where individuals can receive the level of mental health services they need and strengthen our mental health system this was one of AMC's top priorities this session and all 87 counties passed resolutions in support of this initiative another one of AMC's top priorities this year was funding for the local Road Improvement Program and the local bridge replacement program we want to thank you for including 72 million in undesignated funding for the local road improvement program this will go a long way to fund local road projects across the state our final bran finding priority this year was funding for the local Road wetland replacement program we want to stress the importance of funding this program as two of the ten wetland banks service areas across the state are still at zero credits after under under funding for the program in recent years we appreciate the five million included in this bill for this program which will help it'll build up credits but does not eliminate the need for future funds in order for the program to get back up to full capacity thank you thank you very much and now mr. yachts and on deck Steve Elliott morning mr. chair and committee good morning I am Brian ohlet's and I serve as the associate vice chancellor for facilities for the Minnesota state colleges and university system thank you for the opportunity to briefly address the proposed proposal before this committee on behalf of the students faculty staff the board of trustees of the Minnesota State System and traveling Chancellor Mehrotra I thank you for your time and attention last fall and visiting so many of our campuses and seeing firsthand the urgent needs and priorities for capital investment in our campuses you and the committee staff particularly Gavin Hansen ensured each visit was a timely and effective and high professional and the result is detail of this detailed work as evident in the funding offered in this bill to the colleges and universities of Minnesota State we are thankful for the 123 million capital program this bill enables and how it recognizes and delivers on the priorities set forth by our board through our capital development process we recognize this committee has has a great deal of work request before them and there are many hopes that the makes us make we hope that our process makes your work a bit easier this funding begins to address some of the growing asset preservation needs and funds that 10 next priorities enabling construction happen at six campuses and designed to begin work for work at four others the point of a concern is a level of asset preservation funding or he / and our ability to meet the stewardship responsibility associated with our 54 campuses and nearly one-third of the state's the building infrastructure we recognize there is more work ahead we look forward to working with you and your colleagues in the Senate and executive branch in the coming days to bring this to reality a focus will be on bolstering the asset preservation through heber and helping keep our campuses warm safe and drive again mr. chair thank you and shokran for my prior life for your work on this bill and your time and attention this morning thank you very much thank you next we Minnesota State Historical Society Steve Elliot and Jon Jensen military appears to be - morning mr. chair good morning I'm joined by one of my board members General Rick Nash I'm Steve Elliot I'm the director of the Minnesota Historical Society and I want to start by saying thank you so much for this third appropriation to support the important preservation work at historic Fort Snelling our state's first National Historic Landmark and thank you for the ten million dollars in asset preservation which will go a long way to helping on our 26 the story properties our hundred fifty buildings half of which are a century old and very demanding we are just so grateful for for this support and I just want to invite you all to visit the fort as the summers we begin to expand the interpretation and we have a couple of specific programs coming up including an exhibit in the stone barracks that will feature veterans from seven different eras all the way up through Vietnam of Kuwait and Afghanistan and in the three different rooms will highlight why they serve and what it was like to serve at Fort Snelling and what the relationship is between military service and citizenship as we work on those the brick and mortar over the next couple of years the program at Fort Snelling which is dynamic will continue to develop and what we ever-evolving and we look forward to continuing to talk with all of you about that mr. chairman members of the committee I'm Major General retired Rick Nash the former adjutant general for the state of Minnesota mr. chairman I would also like to reiterate your thanks our thanks to each and every one of the members for the support of this project and also for the Legislature's support for the design money in the past two years in order to keep this project moving and on schedule which we believe will be in completion in 2020 in time for the bicentennial of Fort snowing and we also look forward to also expanding at the new visitors center stories of our current military member goes in the pass and those that will come in the future and so this is of a great historic significance to be able to have a new visitor center at the Fort Snelling complex so mr. chairman thank you for the time this is the fifth time I've testified so my comments are already on record both in the different House committees and in the Senate so Thank You mr. chairman well thank you next we have Joel Jensen military affairs and then Eric Verdean of MnDOT good morning mr. chair and and once again thank you for letting me follow Rick Nash it seems like I've done that several times in my career mr. chair and members of this committee I'm Major General John Jensen the adjutant general of the Minnesota jewel it's John yeah I thank you on mr. chair and committee members for your support of the Minnesota National Guard by listing the sake cloud armory renovation in the upcoming bonding proposal house file 44 0 4 I understand that you and the committee faced an extremely difficult challenge in determining the worthiness of the myriad of proposals submitted I'm disappointed that the st. cloud project was the only one of six agency proposals that made the cut and am concerned that this perpetuates a growing pattern of providing insufficient investment in the facilities of the National Guard by federal law the maintenance and upkeep of our armories is split 50-50 between the state and federal government's approval of these projects will result in a one for one match in federal funding without a state match we cannot spend any federal funds on these facilities in three of the five previous bonding bills the Minnesota National Guard has received no asset preservation funding furthering the maintenance backlog of our facilities and leaving millions of federal dollars on the table substandard facilities impact negatively on the readiness of our soldiers there also they also constrain our ability to support the citizens of Minnesota in emergencies by limiting our options for basing of forces to fight floods and recover from disastrous weather events or other emergencies in the department we work very hard to maximize the impact of federal funding and to protect the resources of the state but without adequate state commitment to our facilities our presence in Greater Minnesota is threatened long-term resource constraints have already driven us to accept the strategy of retrenchment in regard to our presence in less populated regions of Minnesota continued under investment in our capital assets results in a growing backlog of overdue sustainment requirements now estimated to be a hundred and forty two million dollars it is only a matter of time before the unaddressed maintenance backlog will cause us to accelerate the consolidation and divestiture of our facilities to reduce our ongoing maintenance obligation to a level that the legislature is willing to sustain something that I do not want to do my goal is to remain in our geographically dispersed armories across the state and not become solely tied to our major urban centers I urge you to work with the leadership to find a way to add sufficient resources to allow the support of our more of our urgent projects I am proud of the support the Minnesota National Guard receives from its citizens its employers and our state and local governments but to go a six consecutive year of an of an underfunded asset preservation bill puts our long-term presence in Greater Minnesota at risk Thank You mr. chair and I stand for any questions well thank you for noting the deficiencies that we have and they just say 800 million neuville will do we can do mr. chair yes mr. chair over the years I've been in committees where the whether it's the military affairs or Veterans Affairs when they come in to our committees they're very well versed and and have planned exactly what their needs are going to be in the future and they spent a lot of time and looking at their facilities and one thing we have to realize it's that it's a 50/50 match when it comes to state funds and federal funds and you have to think how many other agencies come to us with that with that ability to utilize federal funds with our facilities so Thank You general for sharing that with the committee Thank You mr. Mishra presenter thank you thank thank you general next up Eric routine from MnDOT and Tony Sena Thank You mr. chair I'm Eric routine with MnDOT government affairs and I just wanted to draw your attention to the lack of funding in the bill for the stone arch bridge in Minneapolis the department and the governor requested close to thirteen million dollars for that and it's in desperate need of repair in fact we've recently decided that instead of doing underwater inspections of the bridge every five years we have to now do that every year because of the scouring that's occurring below the waterline it's a very historic structure and if we do not receive funding for repairs eventually we may have to to close that bridge also wanted to express our concern over the earmarks in the bill the Department opposes earmarks especially from highway funds because we have an established data-driven process that identifies highest priority projects through an extensive programming process which as MnDOT ever done in earmark mr. chair I believe there have been very limited instances where so when you want one you'd have one yes continue please Thank You mr. chair we have many needs across the system as you know and the problem is a lack of funding which you can certainly appreciate too many projects and not enough funding so the earmarks in the bill are the 94 interchange at Brockton Lane in Dayton Argenta trail and Inver Grove Heights Rockford Road in Plymouth and highway 29 in polk county that project in polk county is was identified in the MnDOT study of rail crossings as the second lowest priority there are about six to seven thousand vehicles per day it's not in the 20-year plan and there really hasn't been a history of crashes in that location the Rockford Road project MnDOT does have a read ekang of that bridge planned for 2022 we originally were planning that for 2019 but we delayed the project at the request of the city and county to try to give them an opportunity to get additional funds to do more than just to read ekang there and the Brockden interchange the bill provides thirteen and a half million the total project cost estimate there is about twenty five point three million there are some other funds of about seven million dollars in federal funds that have been secured and some local funds as well and the department has a project plan in 2020 and 2021 to to redo the pavement in that area and so if funds are available the interchange would be constructed as part of that project Thank You mr. chair no thank you and let me just suggest that if you have questions all brockton you should go see the majority leader and be careful and regarding the the Polk County one I mean the problem there is we were there I mean there can be like 20-minute delays and if you're an ambulance on one side you can't cross and there's really no good route to get around this and that's I think that you you could reanalyze the importance of that it's mainly the emergency vehicles yeah mr. Miller I represent Oh Thank You mr. chair you know I believe that the legislature did try to address earmarks and MnDOT consternation with that with corridors of Commerce and I believe we put in about four hundred million dollars more last year so that we could address some of these specialized projects and then MnDOT chose to come forward and fund four of their pet projects in the Twin Cities so if you want to have a problem with earmarks you need to work with us on the on the projects that we move forward to try and address these special needs thank you your visit Miller ribs of Jergens you covered it chair thank you thank you thank you thank you sure next we have a Tony Santa and then Commissioner cassellius welcome Thank You mr. chair members of the committee I want to thank you for hearing our story and for including the city of st. Paul in the Conway community center in your bill I want to give special thanks to representative Sheldon Johnson who carried our bill but couldn't be here and representative Lillie who helped us present our bill so thank you and I hope you feel better we hope that there was a state investment in the east side of st. Paul and we have the opportunity to leverage ten million dollars of our privately funded money to operate the city property for the next thirty years with our partnership with the city of st. Paul on the east side thank you for our belief in us and hopefully we will move forward and we're open for questions in the future thank you again mr. chair and members of the committee thank you very much mr. Julius and then we have the commissioner program Miller oh you've changed surprised surprised mr. cherrick changed so much mr. chair members my name is ado shoonya I'm the director of gum relations with the Department of Education Commissioner cassellius unfortunately had to step out for a prior engagement but we truly appreciate the chairs ability to squeeze her in and I will just speak briefly on her behalf she wants to check that think that chair and the committee for funding some greatly needed areas in the education area first and foremost that the the bonding money for the Red Lake School District that they've been coming for year after year the roughly 14 million dollars for updates to their Early Childhood Center in their elementary school to provide those updates so that they can serve our youngest learners they've been coming for funding for many years for various projects and they've had some success but that's theirs there's much more to be done as we all know their property tax base is quite low so bonding money is is a great way for them to get these projects up and going as their student population continues to climb and we know that the legislature has had a lot of focus on early learning over the past few years and this would go greatly towards that goal the Commissioner would also like to greatly thank the committee for investment in school safety and we know that that's been a major conversation this session that's one of the areas where we can all agree there's funding in the e through 12 bill and anywhere where we can find more funding to help schools increase the safety for all students and staff members is is a great way to go and so we thank the committee for that and also want to thank just the continued investment in school library construction grants we've seen that there's a demand statewide pretty consistently for that just the libraries around the state have done a very good job with their matches every single year and so we believe that this is a great way to show that we support this continued effort thank you thank you Miss CUNY that was one of our better ones silver next we have Commissioner poka Miller and then we will take a few minutes for public comments from folks not on the agenda Commissioner Polly Miller good afternoon good morning I'm making comments on behalf of the governor sentiment today you know he's pretty committed to higher education in the last couple of years and so I just wanted to preface that and he knows how difficult your job is trust me but having said that with regards to post-secondary thinks your bill lacks commitment proportion and balance with regards to commitment the host is about a third of the governor's request and that's because of the lack of paper money or asset preservation money about two hundred and ten million less than the gut then he had requested for University of Minnesota but twice more than we did last year and that's true miss chairman thinks it needs to be ramped up more and about 120 million less than mints than his request for men state so that's on the level of commitment on proportion the governor had 38 percent of his binding bill for post-secondary education this bill is 24 percent with regards to balance this bill represents only 20 26 percent of the governor's request from the University of Minnesota and 45 percent for in-state then one final thing he wanted to mention is he thinks there's a lack of specificity of missing an opportunity with regards to a clinical research facility at the University of Minnesota we have over he's got a 10 million down payment for that facility there's a sight available he notes that there are hundreds of biomedical research firms in the ministry in state of Minnesota that are currently doing projects jointly with the universities outside the state of Minnesota he thinks that could be done more in Minnesota and that's a jobs issue and it's a basic research issue so quality of the university as well as jobs Thank You mr. chairman okay Thank You mr. Miller even shorter than the last one I would certainly hope that also as we move forward that the University of Minnesota addresses how they can better utilize their endowment reserves of over three billion dollars so when they come to the state of Minnesota saying we need a couple hundred million dollars that they that they wisely use the money that they already have I think that's the trouble that I have when the university comes and says we need more money we need more money we need more money when they have over three billion dollars sitting there mr. chairman if I might just comment on that you might think you need to put in context when endowment money is made specifically for particular projects but the point I really want to make about this is the major research institutions in the country have much the competitors to our University of Minnesota have endowments much much bigger Harvard I think is 36 million Michigan is over 20 mm billion billion I'm sorry and so three billions real money I don't deny that I'm just saying that in the context of the competition they do not have an outsized endowment so what I hear mr. chair is three billion dollars is nothing no mr. chairman three billion dollars is real money but in comparison to the competition in post-secondary education it's not that much thank don't leave yet we have remembers a post but first that I just want to reply commissioner program Miller that we and we put down in our bill wing we included every University of Minnesota request you are asking for things that weren't on the list that we were given mr. chairman respectfully I am NOT the governor of the snow I'm sorry the governor of the state hasn't I'm sorry and it is a ten million dollar down payment on a research facility at our major land-grant institution yes and it's not something that I am opposed to Thank You mr. chairman revs if Wilson Thank You mr. chair on top of the three and a half billion dollars that you have in the endowment fund you also have about two and a half billion dollars in other reserve funds and those reserve funds over the last ten years have grown every single year and I would ask you what are you building those reserves funds for and whatever that is why aren't you using it the Commission poll Camilla Thank You mr. mister that's a better question for the president University rather than myself what I would say is the university in my judgment as an outside observer I don't work for the university it's trying to do the best it can to maintain its financial viability through both tuition increases investments by the state so that it can compete with other major and grant universities like University of Michigan and the other great universities around the country or Wisconsin well the Wisconsin print well I won't say that I was going to say they're doing some damage to themselves so so I think the issue is new the legislature the governor regardless of political party can manage the University of Minnesota's assets I think to some extent we have to trust they're doing the best they can with what they have in the market they're dealing with thank you okay thank you Thank You Commissioner Miller always good to have you thank you mr. chairman appreciate it and now UPS time is something Karen I was gonna comment that you have to be a little bit cautious when you start talking about the universities reserves I served a number of years ago with former governor Carlson on a Blue Ribbon Commission and there was a lot of publicity at the time about the university's reserves and in part it depends on when you take the snapshot you know for example at the beginning of a semester they're collecting a lot of tuition but they have obligations throughout the semester and some people articles in the Tribune and so on they were talking about the size of the reserves and it was greatly inflated at the beginning of a semester as opposed to where it might be at the end the other thing is that those reserves are necessary if they want to attract a star researcher and they perhaps need to reduce some labs and that kind of thing to help recruit that was another thing that the reserves were used for and so the Blue Ribbon Commission I don't know if that report is still around it would be worth some people taking a look at because it did provide much better information in terms of as a result of that Blue Ribbon Commission on the purpose and the need for adequate reserves at the University of Minnesota there was a poster Thank You mr. chairman the snapshot that I looked at representative Carlson was yes mr. chairman I'm not sure what Charlton by ten years are you talking aperture I looked at ten years of the reserve balance like I mentioned earlier it's gone up basically a billion and a half dollars in the last ten years so I've looked at it increase every year for the last ten years so I'm not looking at a snapshot of just a moment in time during the year I understand exactly what you said and you're right there are different times when that fund balance can be higher than others but I looked at ten years thank you thank you thank you next mr. Freeman I think Thank You mr. chair and members jeff freeman the executive director of the public utilities authority i want to thank you for the significant amount of money 120 million dollars in the bill for the CFA water infrastructure programs the amount and the split between grants and loans wastewater and drinking water will allow us to fund all of the projects that are in line for 2018 construction that's a great thing however I am concerned that there will be very little to carry forward for 2019 projects as you know we work from a five-year priority list with projects in various stages of planning and design many cities are now working on projects that are on track for 2019 construction and will need the state assistance if there is an opportunity to do so I encourage you to approve the governor's fall one hundred and sixty seven million dollar request so that projects in the pipeline can keep moving on schedule in addition I have serious concerns about the language in article 2 section 4 the languages is entitled supplemental France but in reality it would create a totally different grant structure that would undermined existing programs and have several negative consequences this would be bad policy current programs combine low-interest loans and very specifically targeted grants based on affordability criteria and treatment requirements grants can be up to 80% but there's always a local share that we then would finance with the launches loans the proposed supplemental language would establish essentially an automatic grant of at least 50% and for many cities up to a hundred percent for any project that they wanted to do this proposal would take away incentives to reduce project costs to explore regional zatia and potential for cost alternatives and to use asset management to maximize the useful life of city's facilities the proposal would also hurt our ability to fully utilize federal funds through our partners USDA Rural Development finally even without any funding attached to it by putting that language in statute it creates a commitment to provide automatic 100% grants cities and the pipeline will put their projects on hold until they end and with that expectation until those grant funds are available this proposal would move us backward and put Minnesota further and further behind in keeping up with water infrastructure needs thank you thank you mr. Freeman see no questions we'll move on to Stephanie Chappell thank you for your time today my name is Stephanie Chappell and I come from a long line of military service folks I'm against the thirty million dollar historic fort snelling project the Historical Society misled and used incorrect information to gain advantage on to the bonding bill the society created a catchy phrase for an ad campaign hash tag HFS 2020 it means historic fort snelling turns 200 in the year 2020 the society knows that's not true the correct year is 2025 the society uses false 2020 date to gain public support and legislative support and made it a major selling point on its bonding application planning excluded veterans veterans organizations and even early Minnesota soldiers and settlers the current design is unbalanced and unwelcoming the military has no permanent gallery or exhibit space there's no Flags there's no military insignia on any of the designs none David Kelleher of the Minnesota Historical Society confirmed only one of three design phases was complete they're not even close to construction further the Minnesota Historical Society has no stable leadership mr. Elliott resigns June 1st this the new CEO doesn't begin until July 1st and he has no experience with the store at Fort Snelling Minnesota Historical Society needs to go back to the drawing board and submit an honest and accurate bonding application for a balanced project and do it in a way that respects and honors the military thank you and thank you and one comment that I want to make to this whole issue is that you have interpretation and you have historic restoration and those are two separate things what we are dealing with is the restoration part and I'm not linking interpretation to restoration I might share some concerns about interpretation but that's a battle to continue on another day the restoration part for historic Fort Snelling is included in subsection 3 of the 10-million and covers three million dollars specifically for historic Fort Snelling yes and what I'm saying is I I'm separating restoration from interpretation it is not our purview here to deal with interpretation we deal with the building and the restoration and the interpretation that's another issue to be dealt with later on thank you let's see who next anyone else in the public who wishes to testify Thank You chair your loan committee members tom diamond Vietnam vet and I'm here to speak on what's missing is house filed 4060 representative sheldon Johnson and Jim Daphne and this is really an important issue certainly for veterans there is a real shortage of skilled care beds in the state of Minnesota but this is not a universal shortage there are 808 beds that are allotted for skilled care from the federal VA so with the eight districts it's at eight congressional districts it's 101 beds per district currently the seventh congressional district has a hundred and six beds the first congressional district has eighty five and eight congressional district has eighty three the second third fourth fifth and sixth districts only has access to 60 beds each it's greatly underserved the veterans and those districts are greatly underserved so proposals that have been put out would actually increase that disparity it would it would make it would provide four hundred and fourteen beds for the veterans in three congressional districts while there would only be three hundred beds for the veterans served in five congressional districts there would only be one veteran home to serve five congressional districts that'd be six veterans homes the three serve three congressional districts and this has real consequences because if you take a look at the wait times where the wait times are here are the ones serving the veterans in the second third fourth fifth and sixth congressional district wait times are generally over a year this is not true of the other veterans homes literally veterans are dying from lack of being able to get into the veteran's home here veteran who died not long ago was waiting for 13 to get into the minneapolis veterans home and when he just got close enough that he could see that he was gonna get in there he passed away without care that's the reality what is happening and this the legislature the house promised in 2013 and the MBTA that there will be a hundred additional beds to make up for the actual loss there's been 150 beds lost to be a hundred beds to replace the additional beds that at home it's in print it's the the doctor policy of the legislature and the MD VA and part of that agreement was that the 91 beds in building six would be retained there wouldn't be a loss of any of those beds those beds has been serving veterans for decades those beds were just quit they quit filling those beds yeah I'm sorry mr. diamond we've given you over a minute extra and I just like to say that you know as you have pointed out we are doing three more homes and there is a connection with some modding action here with those homes and but I think those three homes are going to certainly help and you know maybe more needs to be done in the future but that's what we're doing right now so thank you anyone else wish got a couple minutes good morning mr. chair and members my name is Rollins ah mayor of Wabash in Minnesota we drove up here this morning Roth and I to express face to face our appreciation for including us in the bonding bill however I'm finding that the best way that we can express our appreciation is stay within that 120 second window that the chair is asked for we think that we by partnering with the state we have a lot of good things going on in Wabasha and that area and there'll be a big payback not only for our area but for the region and for the state of Minnesota Roth Thank You mr. mayor Thank You mr. chair and Representatives I think the mayor of wobba said it very succinctly and within the time limit thank you very much for recognizing the statewide asset that we have with the National Eagle Center in an inn located in Minnesota thank you okay thank you I was going to say we couldn't end on a better one than that but apparently we do have another one [Laughter] Thank You mr. chair members of the committee Mary Hartnett with the commission of deaf deafblind and hard of hearing Minnesotans we want to thank you very much for the 2 million dollars in asset preservation and hope I the when the bill gets off the floor that there is some money for the safety and security corridor that the Academy is requested for the 75% of staff or death and the students who are deaf deafblind and hard of hearing thank you so much for investment thank you come on down Thank You mr. chair my name is Scott Patel I'm the public policy director with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights I actually just wanted to bring your attention to one policy provision in the bill that which would actually have no impact on your target so I'm not asking for a project contained within the governor's proposal in article 2 sections 10 and 11 there's some provisions to extend workforce participation goals to all bonding projects currently most bonding projects are covered but depending on the entity that actually does the contracting certain projects are not covered this is something that's been included in the governor's bonding proposal last year now again this year and we are hoping that this will make it into the final bill as we saw on the people's stadium project the Viking stadium project and on the Capitol there were some really positive impacts for participation by both women and people of color in terms of those workforces by working with contractors to make good-faith efforts on that and so we hope that that success can be extended out to more projects so thank you mister chair thank you very much and now mr. Heller Thank You chair and mr. Geller on the capital vessel Rick Heller an official represent the twice exceptional people with print disabilities yet two minutes I'll come here to speak on 4400 for but first of all would be important that the policies documents online in a timely manner and for respect for the chair and their in their staff but when people come to these meetings they give them to them electronically in a 24 hour so they can post it online to provide more fairness saying this and entirely transparency for everybody at the Minnesota Legislature mr. Heller they're posted 24 hours in advance data requests from state departments will will show that however they don't submit them 24 hours in advance I gave you a handout there's nothing posted online today as you look at that so just for the record it's my understanding that infrastructure is important piece it relates to this bill bonny and however it's that's legacy that look looks at programming and I can assure you that both need to apply Minnesota statute 16 0.03 subdivision I wish they'd agencies in some schools are just in Minnesota have to apply and if we're going to provide more successful engagement as relates to fairness and Sandra's and timely transparency we need to start considering how that places in to the digital accessibility for everybody in state of Minnesota to be involved in this process thank you for the opportunity to speak on this Thank You mr. eller and seeing no one else that wishes to come up to speak either with concerns or you thank us we will move on to the amendments and just a few of them first one that we have is the a 1 a representative Eklund are you offering that one here wanted members mr. chairman I'm sorry wait a second oh I've got to do the type you have to do my 85 delete all first now I'm confused the author's we did okay now I got it I am doing my authors amendment now those in favor say aye Bose reveals and now there was no effect Thank You mr. chair now I'll move the a-one amendment if that his pleasure of the chair any one amendment has been moved you have some comments well this just cleans up some language for the DNR on be able to purchase and/or fix some of their buildings as far as the DNR's asset preservation program in this in the bill thank you blend the chair would support this one further discussion those in favor say aye opposed prevails next is the a19 verbs F Miller Thank You mr. chair this amendment has to do with the long-standing practice of previous line requirements on on capital projects with binding money and that's certainly a safeguard that I want to see in place on projects to make sure that the projects move forward that we bond for they can actually afford to do it in the end however there are some exceptions to those and I'd like to add one of those exceptions if you if you look towards the end it's just three words freight rail projects it falls in line with what we already law for passenger rail projects and light rail lines and transit stations this is a the railroad companies are long standing they know how to spend the money properly and I'd like your support on this amendment well thank you Arabs and Miller you have my support on this amendment fantastic any further comments those in favor say aye I oppose the amendment prevails representative Detmer a - yeah Thank You mr. chair I thank you for allowing me to just talk about this I'm not sure it's I'm not gonna I'm going to withdraw it but I think it's important that people the city of Stillwater has an issue especially with the flooding going on right now the and this has been an issue for several years now with the Rodian of the bank if you've ever if you've been down to Stillwater and got on the path the big paddle wheel bolts down there that the bank along that river is eroding away and the main sewer line for the city goes right along that bank and it's eroding and and we have a problem where we could have raw sewage going into the stinky River the city has already committed 1.6 million we're asking for 3.3 and this money would go to the dnr and which the dnr apparently would be overseeing the project my concern to the dnr is if this is an important project maybe the dnr should be handling this project and and funding it through their own funds so that's I'm little too I'm disappointed in the DNR that this project has gotten to this point where it's eroding away what the city wants to do they want to add 12 they'd there's about 12 feet of the bank that has been eroding over the years and the sewer line is exposed the manholes that exposed and it's under water right now so this is a project I think is important and hopefully maybe the as we go forward here that the chair would maybe reconsider this project so I withdraw at this point oh thank you represent Detmer and we'll be in contact with DNR and try to see what's going on with this you have the eight or amendment as well that's right mr. chair and a for a minute there's no cost to it that was brought to my attention by the counties the the a for a minute leverages state flood mitigation grants program also to meet the state's statutory obligation to the mitigation of wetlands like when you put in a road and so forth there's a you have to mitigate the the wetlands it provides that if a wetland is created and of course a building a flood mitigation project the newly created wetland can be used for offset wetlands lost in construction projects adding the turn lanes of a rose and so forth I carried that this type of legislation before for Washington County and Anoka County so again I would definitely like this part of your project and there's no cost to the state I thank you that Moreau there comments questions and Bowser has approved it too right yeah thank you very much in Denver those in favor say aye Boze all right at this point seeing no other amendments we will have the general discussion on did we act on a fiber is no one offering that we did it right away well I was a little bit I'm a little mistake I got back to it and we did it where's of Considine you have your hand up where were you yes mr. chair going back to the bonding and tours this summer I just wanted to point out that when we were in Jackson that representative Lilly did show a remarkable abilities to climb at what was that West Community College as he climbed up the pole and did manage not to fall on that particular day so he does have some skills there but as I was thinking about that I don't remember touring the bill project that was in the bill and I don't actually remember seeing that bill come forward either I'm so I am kind of curious as to where that came from that it ended up in the bill the city of Jackson redevelopment we were in Jackson we didn't tour anything there and again I remember seeing a bill either so it's kind of curious as to where that came from Lily could see it from where he was he was way up there I mean he did surprise me that he even tried that so he don't like I say he does have skills but like I said that kind of triggered the fact that we were there we didn't tour anything there other than the junior college and I don't recall us talking about it in committee either Gunther Oh mr. chairman it was presented in Mankato with a lot of other projects some of them were years I believe on well Fisher Muir was involved in some of them there and it's a Veterans Park it is a long river and it was presented and it seemed like a very worthy thing to have and that was in my part of my city so it was presented to the capital investment committee in Mankato twice in Mankato yeah and we had meetings where people presented their proposals in manky you were there where was a pacify and we're just trying to piece the other our memories of this and I'm not the only one that doesn't remember this then obviously ribs have got there had a car accident and for most of our trips was not with us however he did come over to Jackson and did talk to members about this when he was there oh we should stop by and seen it then while we were in Jackson that probably would have helped my memory like it was okay all right Thank You mr. chair Thank You representative Gunther to give you a private tour oh okay well I don't want to see representative Lilly go up that pole I represented Dean Thank You mr. chair and and I'm a little bit concerned about being on this committee and having accidents yeah well we all do dumb things occasionally representative lily and we won't hold this against you it's really great to see you here so so mr. chair I I'm I'm impressed what you've been able to put together with such a tiny tiny target clearly I've looked through this bill and I've just looked at some general things like asset preservation which we've really short changed a lot and I I'm pretty sure you're aware of that in I mean in every category were they asked for asset preservation I think we tried to give it to them we just shrunk yeah yeah and and I understand that and you know asset preservation is one of those things if you don't fund it it just keeps getting worse and at some point not only this committee but this legislature needs to make a decision either we're gonna seriously fund asset preservation well we're really not going to fund it anymore and it's going to fall on to those agencies to those universities and to those you know local jurisdictions to actually resolve that so when I look at that if you generally double most of the asset preservation here and then of course if you double the you know the local projects which is only in the 80 million dollar range I think we're we're not at where the governor was at 1.5 but that brings us to just over 1.1 billion dollars which given that our capacity is over three and a half billion dollars that's like one third of our capacity so I would hope that as this as this bonding bill moves forward that we'll begin to see not only an increase in in in a dollar amount but meeting the needs a lot of these local places cities townships in other areas and and you know I'm really disappointed that my favor one of my favorite projects is not in here and I'm guessing you'll have difficulty getting the tax chairs vote without the Chatfield project in here and and maybe as we many skiers were shed yeah I hope there were so so I would just you know hope that as you move forward and as you begin to have conversations with the Senate and Republican leadership that we can actually put forward a bonding bill that that really meets the needs that our state currently has so that we're not having the same conversation every time a bonding bill comes up that we're just not doing what we need to do but again I commend the effort and that'll be it for my comments thank you dean Hausman Thank You mr. chair first of all this since this may be our last a committee meeting I know I speak for members of my caucus that we're very grateful to you and your staff who have been very accommodating and easy and pleasant to work with and in all of the touring and and discussion around this and so we thank you for that as I was listening to all the testimony what I found myself thinking is I wish the speaker of the house of the majority leader of the Senate could have been in the room to listen to all of the the testimony that that we heard because obviously there's a lot of urgency and a lot of needs I wanted to speak just about a couple of things about higher education and that is I know the English department at the University of Minnesota is more grateful than one can possibly imagine they have been working for co-vary Hall for years and years and years and at a twenty year anniversary last week celebrating I don't know if you got to the the Kaler House we're having a celebration we were on the House floor and so on I didn't get there but I know that there are just many people celebrating that I'm grateful in Minnesota State you honored the priorities of the system and stuck to those priorities I'm hoping if there is a little more capacity that we might take one more look at the five additional campuses that have small requests because when we do every one of these we also take something off of the deferred maintenance list and so in a sense we add to some of the of the asset preservation needs and and so I think those are worth mentioning it does occur to me since represent lilius here and worked so hard on this we're very grateful for the ten million in Metro Parks but I thought in honor of this special visit maybe we should keep trying for 15 million so we'll see about that but I thought keep you off the monkey bars if those sound as though there continues to be some possibility for additional bonding authority and additional cash and so I'm more than most know that when you start with four billion dollars worth of requests and you have to write a bill for less than a billion you're going to say no more often than you say yes and but I thought I would at least mention maybe some of the most glaring areas of underinvestment as we continue in this next week or so he per for the University of Minnesota and Minnesota State has been mentioned we had testimony about the from Bowser about rim and I think that would be worth underscoring that they started with the request of 30 million dollars which would have leveraged sixty nine point nine million dollars of USDA funds and because we're only at a third of that it means that we have have not quite maximized federal match dollars I thought we were about forty million in applications to date but I think I heard her testify that it's really closer to 255 million just a word about an area of course that's near and dear to me and that is the affordable housing and I want to speak just a minute about request of 30 million for public housing the bill provides 6.7 million public housing serves some of the lowest income residents of the state they are seniors they are persons with disabilities they are families with children nearly 75 percent of the residents of public housing have incomes under 15,000 per year the housing infrastructure bonds the the one thing I wanted to say about them is there is a link to the permanent supportive housing to this new thing that's funded in this bill and that is the mental health crisis centers and here is my one concern about that it's a new program and it solves a problem but if we don't do more of the permanent supportive housing we still don't solve the problem I think senator Senjem and others initially thought we are right now sometimes discharging persons with mental illness diagnosis to the street because they're ready to leave the hospital or the emergency room and there is a permanent housing and so they're discharged to the street and I think the idea of the mental health crisis centers was one of the solutions to that the dilemma is there are 14 beds limited to 14 beds and they're limited to is it 60 or 90 days I don't even know what the what the timeframe it it isn't in the language of the bill but so it means they get discharged there is a short-term place but if we don't also continue to aggressively do the permanent supportive housing there still is no permanent place for them to move to so we run the risk of discharging from them from the mental health crisis centers to the street and so we've got I think a lot of work to do there yet because I believe we might still have some opportunities in the next week or so I thought I would just call a few out that people have spoken to me about and one of those is the safe routes to school which has no funding MnDOT has its first and second request they mentioned the stone arch bridge their second request is the Rochester bus garage and so we we have have no money at this point form in dots number one and number two priority those of you who toured remember our visit to the Saint Peter dietary building we were sweating like heck on that hot day in that hot place and wonder how it would be to work there and that is not in the building bill at this point we're still working on no there's no funding for ports there's no funding for the Chatfield Center for the Arts or the hennepin Center for the Arts they have been waiting to complete their project for a number of years no funding for the revitalized the zoo we had an opportunity to to tour that we heard from met council no funding for arterial BRT development and so we don't move forward on that front so there are challenges ahead I I'm looking at the audience when I speak this because everybody the chair has worked hard to get this message about needs as because it's other people who are making the decision about the size of the bill and that's where the public comes in I've pleaded as everybody has visited my office everybody has to help us with the size of the bill because the bigger the bill the more likely your project is in it and your asset preservation is funded and the smaller the bill but less likely so everyone has a stake in this we say well within our debt capacity guidelines but but here I think members of the public in this next week still have the opportunity to help us and and also to encourage us to work together sooner rather than later and not wait to the last minute so we don't make mistakes and run out of time there is so much at stake in this bill that leads to an economy that's healthy and competitive and so we obviously all we need the support of everyone in the state of Minnesota to help us get this job done and to do it well Thank You mr. chair very much thank you verbs if Hausman represent Miller Thank You mr. chair and I have a just a few comments but I want the first comment to be that I want to thank you for the work that you've done and being someone of more of a reluctant participant Gavin knows that being on the bonding committee kind of makes me itchy and scratchy but I think that you've done a very good job in handling what this is and handling the personalities and and and being very positive about things and I do appreciate and on that positive note I promised that I would be positive with my comments so as you're hearing my things just remember this is me being positive so just a couple comments that in and this really is intended to make a point in the end that representative Grasso made that I want to make sure to give him credit for is if we're gonna spend it spend it wisely okay so the couple of thoughts I have is is 825 billion is what we're looking at and I know that that the requests and the needs may be greater but I do bristle a little bit with it isn't enough or it isn't much where I come from my blue pick grew up in a blue-collar family and I can tell you 825 million dollars is a lot of money okay and we did it we did about a billion dollars last year so it isn't like we're we're Scrooge McDuck and we aren't doing anything with a capacity of three billion I just first of all that number is structured in such a way it's it's defined in parameters I think our capacity is what people are more than current what they're comfortable with willing to spend I have problems when we grow this because if I have these numbers right we have about 1.2 billion in debt service each year that we pay it's not going into these projects per biennium that word that's not going into these projects that could be used for I would like to see in the future some safeguards some balance sheets and some RFPs you know I think when the University of Minnesota comes and says we have these different asset preservation projects I agree that they have asked that preservation but I'd like a little bit more information I use the example not just because it's in my town and not just because it's an important project for me but anyone that has seen the amount of video proposal for their veteran's home if they've seen the physical proposal for that and I know this committee has because they've handed it out they've worked 11 years on their project raised four million dollars against the project where the state is in it for about ten so they've raised 40 percent of that they've updated that proposal every year and I will tell you what answers every question that someone might have they invested heavily on that and I would encourage anyone that comes to the this committee with proposals that they take a look at a book like that because it gives us the information necessary to see okay we see what your priorities are we understand it and I will tell you that if you're asking for anything more than $250,000 you have time to put together that information for us I would like to see I think you did really good in your priorities and at the risk of sounding like I'm challenging those priorities I'm not just want to punctuate one of them I am very sensitive to military affairs and Veteran Affairs my dad served in Korea I served my brother served my son is now currently serving in the Minnesota National Guard and on my floor speech last night I kind of made the point that if we're gonna serve anyone we need to serve those people who are literally willing to die for us that's a very humbling thing and I can tell you that what the general was talking about with the assets in Greater Minnesota one of the reasons why we have those assets in Greater Minnesota is because that's where we have young men like my son willing to serve this great nation and I don't want him to have to travel for three hours when he's already agreeing to serve that's why those assets are out there so I certainly think I look at military affairs and Veteran Affairs and I don't think that they have five billion dollars in reserve assets that they can attest to so I certainly hope that we look at that I agree this number is probably going to go up I think everyone in this room is kind of assuming the number goes up and as we move forward that makes your job even more difficult mr. chair so I I give you great honor and praise in that and I give you a great challenge ahead to work with the Senate which will certainly be a challenge in the governor's office but I'm excited to see what comes to hand and thank you Thank You mr. chair first of all I just want to say that this being my first term first year on this committee how much I enjoyed it I think that the bonding tours I was along on every single one of them and that's a very valuable part of the process it helps us when we get back here and we and we are reminded of the projects we were there we can we have pictures of them we remember Leon climbing the pole we remember things about the projects and so that's a very very valuable valuable part of the process I think this is a good bill there are many projects in here that I like that I was glad to see made the cut made it in here not everything that I wanted is in here as everyone here can kind of test are the same some things are funded but not to the level that I would have liked to have seen but I appreciate the the difficulty of the job that you have in sorting through the requests and paring it down to what we the number that we have to work with so I want to thank you for that I look forward to the next steps whether there is a larger number that comes or not I want to thank you for the work that you've done and I'm a happy that I have been a part of it Thank You representative Hansen Thank You mr. chair and I have some concerns in article 2 but I'm not going to raise them right now I'm going to just directly beg you to provide money to West st. Paul for what to provide money to West st. Paul to reimburse them for the state highway that goes through their community but they are currently 17 million dollars in debt because they paid for it I beg you nothing else has worked for four years and represent Ansan you have done a job of making this aware and making us aware of this and certainly be looking to do what we can do right now we have 8.5 million in cash and you need cash and so we will see what we will see where the process takes us but I do appreciate your participation on the committee and your ardor and candor and bring forth your issues including this one there was no Becklund Thank You mr. chair and appreciate the time this is directed to the Historic Society I had a body project that at their request I did not push so in the part of this asset preservation fortune that you have I want to see where grand mound fits into your plans the folks of koochiching County certainly deserve some answers and I would like to see where they're at thank you there was a Considine Thank You mr. chair given the constraints that you were working under from your leadership as far as the amount of money I feel like you have done an outstanding job and I want to thank you I would like to point out there are two things as we move forward that I hope will remain in play the kitchen at st. Peter I believe is truly dangerous asking people to work in a hundred 120 degrees while they're trying to prepare for the food I think we're just looking at a potential for somebody to have a heart attack or heat stroke and I think that's is truly a dangerous working situation the other thing is from my days on the City Council if you have assets you need to protect them and if there's any way just get some more money for heber I was at South Central College and walking around trash cans and garbage cans as the water was coming through the roofs and I know there are others again that's just something that can remain in play I would hope we could look at that thank you you represent constant I appreciate that you know keep in mind that we we did go 3/4 of the way down the mid scooter Minnesota state list and a lot of those things are asset preservation that wasn't criticism mr. chair and I believe there was f sock Thank You mr. chair as you're aware I've had concerns about one element of this whole process and that is the setting of expectations I think our system here invites an ending that is going to be replete with disappointment we make believe that the quality of the presentation or the quality of the argument is significant in whether or not you'll get there it doesn't matter whether you're a city of six hundred people or a University of Minnesota and I think it is it if the system creates the disappointment and I I would offer that we I think would be much better served as a society a whole state if we knew going in that there were bands that had to be satisfied before we moved to other bands my way of illustrating that this is just me but I think a better system could be developed in this idea is that state owned buildings so you might click through that real quick in your head it starts with these buildings here goes down the street University to the University of Minnesota it goes out to this Minnesota State if you took all of that and said that's the first band if we don't satisfy the physical stewardship in that band we don't move on that means that if that's where we are in expectation so there's two elements to this one is there kabuki game that we play with the number so we've got the city of Rochester asking for four million dollars for a bus garage because they think it might be there if the numbers right well what a silly game that is what city should plan in that kind of an environment I don't buy this system I think that there could be other bands that would come in whether it be assets that are owned by local governments counties then cities the last thing we get to then our entertainment factors things that we just think are cool we see all kinds of expectations here and and requests and all of that and I I think we have become so diluted in what we're considering that works forcing ourselves into artificial judgments so that's what I would offer I am amazed at at the evenness of hand that was exhibited by the chair and or whoever his close counselors would be when you're when you have a number that is so low and you have a system that invites such ambiguous requesting and you you know we invited requests that would have out of the block been somewhere between three and four billion dollars there was no doubt I think we all knew that when we got up in the morning and the first day opened up the request sheets we knew it was going to be that big because that's the system we have if we know we're gonna be dealing with a budget and somebody needs to get in front of these kinds of things somebody needs to say hey this year is going to be between I don't care make up some numbers eight but no more than nine hundred million well if that's it I think there's a lot of requests that would understand you know what this is just not my year so I I'm disappointed in the system not in the action of people I think the everybody that's functioning here is functioning at a very high level very high level of discernment a very high level of Ernest but I am very concerned that we're functioning in an old system that has just gotten away so Thank You mr. chair and thank you Arizona sign there was a Frankie Thank You mr. chair I'll be brief I just want to say thank you thank you to the staff thank you to the committee and I want to throw one more quick plug in for the aviva program should more money become available hey thank you zip Carlson yeah Sherman I uh I don't want to join the chorus I'm saying no thank you I think you did a good job with limited resources I kind of know the knew that this discussion or I was going to take place when we passed the budget resolution and ways and means I raised many of the questions that you're hearing about now there and I do know although I don't know what all the commitments that the chair of ways and means have made but and there seems to be a desire on both sides of the aisle that there may be some opportunity to have the bill grow a bit and I think probably the next step is to have that discussion because I assume that the chairs motion will pass that refers this two ways and means and if there is some uncommitted dollars there and I have a pretty good feeling that there is I do follow that fairly closely and the first step in that process would be to bring the budget resolution forward for an amendment and the second step in that process would be to adjust the bottom line number for the capital investment bill and I think that if that were to be the case then some of us have to engage in what some of the next steps might be and I think you're hearing what some of the concerns are here today they like it's not directed that's much as what's in the bill but desire to have perhaps either some things enhanced and or perhaps some projects and unfortunately haven't quite made it in yet but I suspect that discussion will be taking place fairly soon but I do want to thank you for your work mr. chairman oh thank you I do want to thank your staff as well by the way I do know having been involved through the years putting together some of those site visits and they were well organized and I think we should be sure to compliment your staff for their input and in having that done so welcome thank you thank you in just a brief comment as I look around this table and see all these untanned faces and I look at the Commissioner former representative Atkins who just walked in you see guys that's what happens when you don't have to sit in here all spring Thank You mr. chair and I just want to tell everybody you yourself and all the staff thank you for all the hard work that you've done and it's been a pleasure to work when I thought everybody around this aromas committee I'm just going to jump on the wagon with the chair Detmer the representative Miller is in reference to we've got these programs or these projects from for the National Guard that I think would be some very give give some very serious thought to it's it's money that's waiting for them to utilize to upgrade from the federal aspect and if we're if it's if we have to spend more than like I said let's let's make some wise investments and I agree with representative Sox the approach that get the stuff done that needs to be done the rest of it will address as we as we can I think um representative lily yes they're glad you're still with us thank you glad just do with us and I hope you heal up well thank you sir represent Detmer thank ya again represent grass silver rose representin Miller made some good comments and I just want to remind the committee and the chair again when we're looking at our military affairs that every dollar that the state spends the federal dollar will come in also so we need I don't know how many other projects will do that for us so let's keep looking at our our facilities for our National Guard thank you and thank you for your work chair thank you represent bully um Thank You mr. chair and members I I'm not sure exactly where to start but I'll just kind of start there at the end because you were talking about the veterans kind of things and a couple of us are on stake of Finance too and just like to add I if there is gap somewhere I sometimes I really wish as a state we'd we just fund them straight up and do it ourselves right and get it done and because when those folks are there and we look him in the eye and we know what they've done for us and we all value him from every corner of the state the folks that have worked for us I just wish we'd figure out a way to and I kind of personally think bonding wouldn't be a bad way to build them and pay for ourselves but anyways I don't want to get into all that but um please don't blame Minnesota West for for my climbing mishap but I just didn't closing I want to you know thank everybody for the card and I just I asked to be on this committee and I'm here I'm on purpose I'm I'm still a little sore but you know I got really attached to to who every one of you you know and then and you get attached to these projects too I don't think people realize so even the ones that you cut and so it's I mean you I hope people don't think it's easy for any of us and we it there's so many good things and yeah there could be more but it's it's it's it's a great state we have you know and to be able to travel like we all have been able to do and and just kind of final in closing I wanted to defend Jared hunter for a second because one year you guys did a little in capital investment we did a Veterans Memorial Park in my city and I'll tell you I Drive by a thing every day and and I don't know exactly what yours is but I'm Tanya that thing is it's it's pure gold to our city so and I'm hoping you get the same for yours so anyways thank you where's Evan Bennett Thank You mr. chair and I just like to say one thing job well done thank you well then I just have a few quick things to say myself and just in in answer a little bit to some of the comments we made first of all even though many of you would like more 825 million still is a lot of money and I we can't I can't guarantee it's going to get bigger even though there's a sentiment of many of you that it should but don't approach that as a sure thing that's going to happen represent of sock I think those are some good suggestions I don't know if would ever get out of band one but but that's something to certainly something to look at you know when we went around the state I tried and people who come to my office I pretty much told everyone that you know we have many many more requests than we have money and so there's no guarantee that just because they come and ask for a project that's going to happen so I we tried to be to be honest and you know the governor certainly I've worked well with more of the years appreciate what his job is what he's trying to do but when he says where's the other half we needs got a 1.5 billion dollar bonding proposal well he does not have to get votes to pass his proposal I would frankly have some serious problems maybe not with you guys but over here at 1.5 billion and you know this is a very complicated thing is I know you appreciate to put together and we've we've tried I think get 825 really 800 because 25 was carved out for us right away to do what we can do and you know look forward to continuing the process however this takes us to continue to try to do the best bill that we can because in the end what we are trying to do is serve the needs of the people of Minnesota you know all other considerations aside that's why we are here that's why we are this committee and that is what we're trying to do and we will continue to try to do it the best we can once again no matter where this process takes us and so with that I would certainly be remiss if I didn't do some thank you indeed well and so first of all our nonpartisan staff they've Dyson and yeah and Julie certainly appreciate all that you have done not just this year but for the many years you have served in this capacity our staff our pages Emma to Dean back there Emmett wave at us there you go CLA Jennifer ago Bush who keeps me in line much of the day yeah speaking of people who keep me in line the guy sitting next to me Gavin who's done an excellent job and I'm appreciate that you recognizing that in your comments to him as well a researcher or partisan researchers jason rector you know i all the members I certainly enjoy what you have done and a pleasure working with you as a committee with it with Alice Hausman doing a you know very good in her role as as lead Democrat here and appreciate the the advice and the suggestions she gives me because someone with her years of experience in the role that I have right now should not not be ignored and jenni nash also thank you to Jenni for the work that he does for the time that she has been also involved with this committee so with that all we have left to do is do a boat I think so we'd like to I would like to renew my motion to pass health file 40 404 as amended two ways and means those in favor say aye opposed know who did that [Laughter] prevail thank you Oh a wait wait wait wait I didn't tell you to go yes sergeant Preston would say well King this case is closed [Music] tips to defend thesis SUNY Technology Colleges.

Your One and Only Stop for All Types of Writing Services

All types of works. All kinds of complexity. Any deadline. Any time.

Our Samples

Our Samples

We write from scratch
according to your instructions.

Our Guarantees

Our Prices

Start at $10/page. Edit and
proofread your paper.

Our Prices

Our Guarantees

Get plagiarism free papers,
100% guarantee!

Want to make sure if we have an available expert? Learn now! Place a Free Inquiry
We have taken appropriate security measures to protect you against loss, misuse or alteration of the information we
have collected from you. Please read our Privacy Policy to learn more.